Please help- For finer grain is TriX best in Rodinal or D-76?

calderasf

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2005
Messages
1
Location
San Francisc
Format
Medium Format
Perceptol is no longer


Hi Perceptol has been discontinued 12/04 I recommand ID-11 for the best grain now Perceptol was so fine grained I didn't have grain!!! On Ilford 50 asa pulled to 25 ASA develped 1:3. I am starting over with ID-11 again 1:3 I'm a have huge fan of extended development times. Ilford rep told me that the Perceptol was over kill on grain in 1:3 and I would like the increased sharpness (if that is possible I felt I was so sharpe already) and my grain still would be very fine. Time will tell has I have just started again in B & W after long layoff. Mario > Giordano
 

dancqu

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
3,649
Location
Willamette V
Format
Medium Format
Maine-iac said:
The above MYTOL will work fine, except that the sulfite is totally unnecessary and does nothing in a Phenidone/Ascorbate developer.

The fellow who compounded MYTOL, the homebrew XTOL; he did
not know that the sulfite in his formula was "totally unnecessary"
and "does nothing"? Imagine that. Dan
 

jim appleyard

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
2,413
Format
Multi Format
fotophox said:
Sodium metaborate = borax (the Mule Team stuff)?


Sodium Metaborate is the same as Kodak's Kodalk and its new name Balanced Alkali.

Borax is Sodium Tetraborate, more commonly known by its trade name, 20 Mule Team, available in grocery stores.
 

jim appleyard

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
2,413
Format
Multi Format



If the Sod. Sulfite does nothing, then what acts as the preservative for the developer? Does the Vit. C do double duty, preservative AND developer?
 

fhovie

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2003
Messages
1,250
Location
Powell Wyoming
Format
Large Format
dancqu said:
The fellow who compounded MYTOL, the homebrew XTOL; he did
not know that the sulfite in his formula was "totally unnecessary"
and "does nothing"? Imagine that. Dan


I'll bet Mytol was reverse engineered from XTOL and so the team of Phd's at Kodak had no idea the sulfite was uncesessary. The sulfite does some softening of the grain -
 

Tom Hoskinson

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
3,867
Location
Southern Cal
Format
Multi Format
jim appleyard said:
If the Sod. Sulfite does nothing, then what acts as the preservative for the developer? Does the Vit. C do double duty, preservative AND developer?

Yes, the Vitamin C acts both as a preservative and a developer. The sodium sulfite affects solution pH and also is a silver solvent.

I personally prefer the version without the sodium sulfite.
 

Charles Webb

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2004
Messages
1,723
Location
Colorfull, C
Format
Multi Format
Nichole,
Apparently you did not read my comments in a similar thread. Hunt up what I wrote, try it, and you will not be sorry! I dont pretend to be an artist, but I have a damn fine reputation as a professional photographer.

I do know what works without a bunch of tom foolery going on! All of these
favorite brews that have been listed, will develop film. When you have tried them all, D 76 will be close to the top of the list in giving super sharp nearly grain free printable negatives.
 

ian_greant

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2003
Messages
402
Location
Calgary
Format
Multi Format
hmm I've done this comparison so I might as well kick in my opinion.

I use TriX for natural light portraits and generally end up pushing it 1 to 2 stops. Even with a three stop push the grain is not overly intrusive. The contrast can make printing a chore.
I tried rodinal and found it wasn't complimentary for the work I did. Oddly enough many people don't like having harsh grain in their photos. Occasionally I'd get a neg that was really nice but in general it was too fussy for me.

D76 is simple, cheap, available and flexible. Now, these are not attributes that appeal to many here but you have to choose what works for you.

On the other hand I really like rodinal for large format landscape and architecture.

I've attached a couple negs done in D76. (the 35mm is actually pushed about 3.5 stops)
 

Attachments

  • henri3_500.jpg
    88.2 KB · Views: 164
  • 10w.jpg
    37.5 KB · Views: 171

Tom Hoskinson

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
3,867
Location
Southern Cal
Format
Multi Format
Charles Webb said:
Nichole,
When you have tried them all, D 76 will be close to the top of the list in giving super sharp nearly grain free printable negatives.

I agree with your fine grain statement about D76.

I disagree with your super sharp statement. D76 is a low acutance developer - Kodak says so and my own test results agree.
 

JohnArs

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 20, 2002
Messages
1,074
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
Hi everyone

I'm for example not interested in the cheapest soup, for my negs only the best compromise is best and this is for me Xtol.
Its almost the same as the Amen in the church!
I buy not modern and expensive sharp lenses and then make a compromise at the developing stage. Film and developer are in my opinion the cheapest part of my work!
Good light and nice shadows to all of you!
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…