- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
- Messages
- 29,832
- Format
- Hybrid
i don't really know where ( or how ) to post this question ...
it is about seeing, equipment, film, exposure, processing printing, presentation pretty much everything that photography seems to be about
i know people like to do what they like to do. some folks like to photograph their pets, others their yard, and garden, others life (street, portraiture)
and others .. the built and natural environment and still others "other" . for some it not only is something they love to do ( maybe a hobby or a job ) but it over
the years, over the endless rolls processed, sheets exposed, alternative process chemistry spread on the sheet ends up seeming like just going through the motions.
not saying it isn't enjoyable or photography is supposed to be something else .. or is it ?
sometimes i find myself taking the same photograph i took 30 years ago, and to be honest i am not sure if it is any better than the first time i saw it.
is taking the same photograph over and over playing it safe ?
even though it might be a portrait of a different person, a photograph of a different building, different people walking on the street infront of you,
differnet countryside is it any different than it was before ?
not even sure if playing it safe is the right expression .. but by doing something one feels comfortable doing too safe and not allowing
the person making the photographs a chance to get "better" or "grow" (sorry for the cliché'd expressions ).
Taking the same photograph over and over (once you are proficient at technique) shows a lack of imagination and/or boredom.
I'm too busy telling a story with my photographs to worry about 'taking the same picture I took 30 years ago.' Most photographers aren't doing that; they obsess over making an individual image that is interesting or pretty. Then they get bored with it because they look at years of work and it is just a stack of unrelated photos.
playing it safe ?
Taking the same photograph over and over (once you are proficient at technique) shows a lack of imagination and/or boredom.
Safe from what?
Wasting time and materials on an image that won't sell?
Blowing your own cover and becoming disillusioned with your personal myths of being a good photographer?
Failing to impress someone?
Feeling like a failure?
Man, you're the most imaginative guy on this site. You go places no one's been, with really interesting exploratory work that defies categorization, yet has a steady theme running through it. You mess with the materials the way an artist is meant to, looking for limits and crossing lines. Take solace, and don't stop what you're doing.
(I just read a piece in the NYTimes about a hermetic painter who painted triangles and p-like images for 40 years, in secret, and now people realize his single-minded genius. Maybe there's a lesson here. Ignore the world, do what you are doing, and see where it takes you.)
What is uncomfortable?
Should Chopin only write ONE nocturne?
What I meant was, what do you mean by uncomfortable? A sneaking feeling? Doing something that makes you worried for some reason? A sick feeling in the stomach that you are doing something wrong? What is the reason to play it safe when being an artist? Protecting your money, protecting your reputation, protecting your idea of yourself, fear of facing failure?
I think it's complicated.
I once said that Norman Rockwell's work was a cop out because he just did the same "style" over and over. People were not impressed with my statement.
But it's complicated when it comes to "commercial" work vs personal or hobby stuff. In commercial work, the wisdom is you develop a unique style and stick to it because it's easily recognized as yours, thereby earning you massive sums of money. Or not.
In personal of hobby stuff, we can easily get in a rut, get lazy, or just like the "style" we're in. The challenge comes when we become dis-satisfied with it and become bored.
Then it's time to give ourselves projects to get the juices flowing again. Sometimes it's also time to take a break. Evaluate and reflect. I do it every 7 years. I just stop and clear my head for a few months.
For me the number one way to get motivated is to take a workshop, study with someone, and get it all cranked up again.
thanks blansky
you hit the nail on the head
it IS complicated.
in a handful of 7 year-resets
have you ever reverted back to
one of the veins you were drilling before,
but from a different perspective ?
yeah, i know it is all a shift in perspective ..
but ...
In our throw away society, it seems more permanent. Less trendy.
I once said that Norman Rockwell's work was a cop out because he just did the same "style" over and over. People were not impressed with my statement.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?