I just had a thought.
As much as I love taking pinhole shots using many of my self-built or modified pinhole cameras, I do also take a lot of shots with 'real' lenses (you know, the ones with glass in them).
Has anyone ever tried enlarging using a pinhole? Not enlarging a neg taken with a pinhole, I mean taking a regular negative and using a pinhole instead of an enlarging lens. I know it'll take ages to expose in the darkroom (but I'm sure we're all used to that around here). Would the results differ much from a pinhole-exposed lens-enlarged shot?
If noone's tried it, I sense a summer-holidays test-project coming on...
I've thought about it but not very seriously, but I'm sure it's possible and I think I remember reading about one, maybe at the Stanford pinhole site. One thing I have done is used my macro pinhole camera to make an "enlargement" of a small part of another negative. The "source" was an area of paper negative not much bigger than a 35mm negative, and the result was a 5x7 positive. I remember the first time I tried it I thought it would need a long exposure and I tried something like 20 minutes, but in fact all it needed was about 1 minute. The "target" negative was just lit with 2 CFL desk lamps.
Considering the effective f-stop of a pinhole, the slowness of print papers, and a practical light output of any enlarging bulb you would encounter VERY long exposure times. Not really practical.
It should work. I don't know how good the resultant image would be, but I've shot paper negatives plenty of times in an 8x10 camera using a pin hole of about .65mm. Good exposures were attainable within 2 - 3 minutes. It should work if the light source is adequate.
I just had a thought.
As much as I love taking pinhole shots using many of my self-built or modified pinhole cameras, I do also take a lot of shots with 'real' lenses (you know, the ones with glass in them).
Has anyone ever tried enlarging using a pinhole? Not enlarging a neg taken with a pinhole, I mean taking a regular negative and using a pinhole instead of an enlarging lens. I know it'll take ages to expose in the darkroom (but I'm sure we're all used to that around here). Would the results differ much from a pinhole-exposed lens-enlarged shot?
If noone's tried it, I sense a summer-holidays test-project coming on...
I had considered the same thing to introduce my best friend to enlarging. She really enjoyed developing film, pinhole photos, and sun-print (cyanotype), so I figured it would be a cheap and fun way show her enlarging. Then, a camera store went out of business and I ended up getting a couple Vivitar 356 enlargers, so I never pursued the idea. (Still haven't gotten around to enlarging yet.)
If I were doing this, I'd do it "backwards", with the negative holder and lights in the room, not necessarily a darkroom ( curtains closed might be good enough ), and a pinhole "copy camera" mounted above it. It's easy enough to build a pinhole camera to hold any size of photopaper. I think the pinhole would need to be rather small, and you might want to look at the Dead Link Removed, and design the focal length based on enlargement factor.
Not sure of the advantage, except for the softness of pinhole photos. The negative is not three-dimensional like the world when you're taking an original photo. Would be interesting to try though, and not very difficult.