Photomechanical filters

humdee

Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2013
Messages
2
Format
35mm
Does anyone know the difference between a Kodak Wratten Gel Filter and a Kodak Wratten Photomechanical Filter with the same number?

Thanks
 

artonpaper

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
336
Location
Staten Island, New York
Format
Multi Format
My limited experience suggests that the Kodak Wratten Photomechanical Filter is sturdier. They will be handled much more than the gel filters. In theory both would have the same light absorption qualities.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
No.

http://i.ebayimg.com/t/Kodak-Wratten-PM22-Photomechanical-Filter-10-2cm-4x4-Square-NEW-Old-Stock-/00/s/MTA2M1gxMDk0/z/q44AAOxywCJRbkGU/$T2eC16R,!)kE9s4Z+l5jBRbkGUQQg!~~60_57.JPG

This is the backside of of a envelope printed as carrying a "Wratten Photomechanical Filter".
As you see the text indicates that it is a cutable, not to be touched filter. Thus a gel filter.


Maybe as colour seperation filters can also be used for pictorial photography Kodak just packed those useful/intended for colour seperation work also in those special envelopes.
 
OP
OP

humdee

Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2013
Messages
2
Format
35mm
Thanks for the replies.
Both types of filters are gels and they both have exactly the same handling warning on the package. The only difference I can see is that the surface of the Photomechanical filters seems to be just about completely smooth, while the "regular" Wratten gels are usually a little bit "dimply." Could the Photomechanical filters be a slightly higher quality?
 

edp

Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Messages
195
Format
Multi Format
The best "photomechanical filter" is the spinning turbine on a Goerz Hypergon.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…