Having shot a lot in mines... realize that it is more difficult than you may imagine... even if they have it artificially lit. Use the fastest film you have. The Acros will be impossible to work with for anything but a long time exposure. As Bruce mentioned, seriously consider fast color film too. My additional suggestion: bring an electronic flash so you are not totally disappointed.Enjoy and have fun!
p.s. You'll probably find that doing smaller detailed shots easier than trying to do large "landscape" images. How big are these caverns anyway... and where in upperNY are they?
I shot workplace documentation in Gouveneur area potash mines... two winters in a row. That was an experience that remains in my heart and mind. Being underground was a LOT nicer than being on the surface at times.
I'd consider a short-tele lens as well, depending on the cavern size. ............... Ektar 100 (if you calculate correctly it holds up well to long exposures without too much color shift. If you under expose it goes cyan, though)..
Suggestion: Fire a flash from behind a formation. Some of them will fluoresce quite spectacularly, and you often get a range of different colours showing through.
Unfortunately the only other lens i have for my Bronica is a 250mm.
You might want to try painting with light; moving around and flashing areas in the photo while leaving the shutter open. Don't know how it would work, but it has always intrigued me as a possibility in very dark spaces. I have seen some wonderful work done that way.
Unless you're using flash, it's hard to know exactly what kind of lighting you'll encounter and how your film will react to it. I'd go with the previous suggestion of having ACROS and Delta 3200 on hand, and forget the Tri-X. Everything depends on whether or not you'll be able to use
a tripod. Pity if you can't. A nice accessory to have is a little laser pointer, because it's a lot easier to focus on a laser spot in some dark recess
than guessing what's in focus through your viewfinder. Color-film -wise, hard to say unless you get a practice round and review the results.
But just winging it, I'd opt for Portra 400.
I'd guess that a 250 would be hard to work with in a cave... although could be good to get some detail shots. The real beast will be composing and focusing with it in a dark space. The suggestion of a laser pointer is a really good one, I'll have to try that myself.
I think I read somewhere on APUG that a flash BULB may work quite well in a cave, if you are able to use that on your camera.
If I recall correctly, Kodak makes Portra 800 as well. It would get you a stop faster than the 400, which may be useful if you're pushing. It's actually 1/3 stop slower than the real speed of Delta 3200, which in reality is a low contrast 1000 speed film.
More info, please. So what was the light levels like? Did they have a lot of artificial illumination or just enough for visitor safety? What was the shooting experience like? Was it crowded or could you set up tripod and work without too much interference. Enquiring minds want to know!
My roll of Tri-X came out blank. I just don't understand it. So now I'm just hoping the Ektar and Portra came out.
I've never had a blank roll of film before.
Anyways next week I hope to have the color film back.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?