• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Photographic terminology and words you hate.

Never cared for soup. I dislike capture, but I detest imaging. Probably because some genius thinks my title should be imaging specialist. "Shooting" is unfortunate.
 
Hassy or blad.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
 
I'm surprised no one has mentioned the '800 pound gorilla in the APUG room' - digital

 
I have a problem if on the camera strap, on "modern" digital cameras it says digital. All cameras nopwadays are digital why write it. It is nothing special anymore. If I was a business man I would make a lot of money with camera straps which say analog.
 
"Image", except when it is necessary to be extremely generic, and include photographs, paintings, sketches ...
 
"Pigment Print" as an alias for inkjet. As I practice traditional carbon-transfer, this really gets me riled!
 
"Beautiful photograph, you must have a really nice camera."


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
 
What is a Hyphenated-American?

I better not answer that here. Too off-topic. I see you're from England. It's an annoying scourge fad amongst us over here in the colonies.
 
Post processing. The print is the end result. Achieving that print is a continuum of creation. I don't see any stopping point where I can say that I am post processing after that.
 

The Principles and Elements of Art (as well as design) are a long-formalized list describing the process and product of artwork and the making of art. It is an, if not the appropriate means to discuss artwork that permits people to engage in the work beyond saying "I like it" or "I don't like it". Of course there will always be some that eschew anything academic for a variety of reasons. My point is that such a vocabulary is neither meaningless nor inappropriate.

For the word I dislike as it is most commonly used in relation to photography, see my signature.
 
Somone who is described as the 'Author' of a photograph. Authors write not take pictures.
 
Bokeh and capture, I spent the first forty years of photography not knowing either. My special hell is reserved for 'workflow'. I assume this means shooting everything in digital RAW and spending hours mulling over each frame to decide whether it should be monochrome, colour, HDR, or something else from software fantasy world, but have never been interested enough to ask.
 
Optics for a lens
Analogue / analog for film photography
Souping in soup (or sewage, as it is used in some languages)
 
For me the term "wet" darkroom is infuriating. Digital photographers (digitographers) don't work in any place which remotely resembles a darkroom. It may be a studio, an office, or ,God forbid, a cubicle, but they definitely do not work in a darkroom. So why a "wet" darkroom?!
 
One can divide a darkroom into two sections: one for loading cassettes etc. and exposing prints etc. and another for doing the processing
 


I agree.
 
Hate to admit it, but I've probably used a lot of these betes noires at some point or other. There is one, and only one term that annoys the f**k out of me, and that's fine-art photography.
 
"Shooting" which meanwhile is used here too.

(Or even "shoot" as noun, which seemingly does not even exist in English.)

It does. Used by some professionals. For example: "I have a big shoot coming up this week."
 
So much misuse of the term 'bokeh' by today's photographers, in the (wrong) context of 'background blur'...."I want less bokeh"