• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Photographic Snobbery & Other Annoyances...

michaelsalomon said:
Snobbery in photography for me is when the photographer believes his or her photographs are better or more important or more pure due to the choice of materials and tools they use.
Click to expand...

No - that's just insecurity. NOT that anyone HERE does that... but I've seen MANY people who try to compensate for lack of talent that way... just as others make up for lack of technical skill with talent. Whatever - we're all mixed bags.
 
So - I was thinking about this thread this afternoon - driving around in the car. One of the things that did occur to me - perhaps one of the most short-sighted, pretentious and ridiculous things... was 'destroying one's negatives' after a run of prints. I personally think that's just plain stupid - and stems from the fear that one's work won't be taken seriously as art. Seems to me photography is all about reproduction. (there's a joke in there in another context maybe!)

... and another thing is 'the archival print' - in certain contexts, let's say. Who the hell do you think is going to care about your print in a hundred years? Or, in some cases now...?

do i sound bitter?
 
I am not referring to any one person or group in particular. The snobbery to which I referred in my own experience has been from a small group of photographers who judge the photographer based on the equipment and materials they use, lets say a guy with a nikon f5 thinking he's a better or more serious photographer than another guy with a canon rebel, or a guy proclaiming he's a better or more serious street photographer because he has a leica and the other guy isn't because he has a nikon f.
 
michaelsalomon said:
The snobbery to which I referred in my own experience has been from a small group of photographers who judge the photographer based on the equipment and materials they use....
Click to expand...

OF COURSE!! That's what it's all about!! We only take photographs to give us JUST ENOUGH 'street cred' to back up the materialism. Come live in LA where a man is judged solely by the similarity of his car to either;

1. A black or silver BMW, 500 series and above
2. A black or silver MBZ, 300 and above
3. a black or yellow hummer or geländeswagen....

Me, I drive a '92 cherokee - and proud of it!
 
not for nuthin' but I really wasn't referring to anyone here when I wrote my post , and my apologies if anyone takes it that way - like I said, snobs are all around us, lets just ignore em' and shoot. Anyway I'm going to go put some Tom Waits on and have a glass of chivas, hoping to wake up early tomorrow to go do some shootin'
 
Roger Hicks said:
If the OED says it is of obscure origin -- and they are noted for some rigour in these matters -- then I have little faith in such a contrived invention as the one quoted.
R.
Click to expand...

That's also close to the definition given by some French language sources. At the time of the French Revolution, schoolchildren were noted as being s. nob., or sans noblesse. In the context of the Revolution, this was an important distinction, leading to an elevation of the status of a snob.
 
copake_ham said:
Scott,
I didn't say I agree with the OP or Brooks' point; only that the OP was not the only one voicing it.
Click to expand...

Pardon my ignorance, but what's an OP? The only place I have heard that abbreviation was referring to Fairbanks Morse opposed piston diesel engines, and somehow I don't think that's what's being discussed here!
 

hence the apparently

Damn - why isnt there a [sarcasm] [/sarcasm] to inform those who dont get it???
 
Here's some tounge-in-cheek:
"Hyperfocal distance vs DOF"
"Film is soooooo retro"
"The print doesn't matter, only the image"
"My lens is longer than your lens"
"I would never use anything but Bogen tripods"
"You must use a stop bath after development"
"Photography is not really an art form, like painting"
"My digital darkroom"
 
Ian Leake said:
Every field has it's special jargon and slang so it's not worth worrying about. Learn the words and use them or not depending on your own preference.
Click to expand...

Specialized jargon is another tool which diference "US" and "THEM"
 
davetravis said:
"Hyperfocal distance vs DOF"
Click to expand...

Snobbery? Guilty. f/ 32 or 45 (or whatever) and be there............ doesn't always cut it. Genuine use of hyperfocal distance can be smart, not snobbish.
 
And while we talk about snobbery, what do you think about word Leica...
 
haris said:
Specialized jargon is another tool which diference "US" and "THEM"
Click to expand...

Oh nonsense. Do you think a recording engineer refers to headphones as "cans,: a floor monitor as a "wedge" or the cable from a mixing console to a microphone distributuon block as a "snake" in order to make visitors to the studio feel like outsiders? All professions have slang and while the unititiated may not be familiar with it, neither the origins nor the purpose generally have anything to do with the unititiated.
 
This has the makings of a fine troll...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register