After that it is hard to keep the number under ten with the intense competition.
- Ansel Adams
- Edward Weston
- Dorthea Lang
- HBC
- Arthur Fellig
- Henri Cartier-Bresson
Is #4 (assuming you meant HCB) the same as #6?
Gosh, there are so many I hardly know where to start. I did note as I was jotting down a list that all of them did their best work 50-100 years ago. That's not to say I don't like some modern and contemporary photography, just that I wouldn't take much of it to my proverbial desert island.
I was thinking that a thread on your favourite 10 living photographers might be interesting.
I was thinking that a thread on your favourite 10 living photographers might be interesting.
I don't follow photography closely enough to even name 10 living photographers.....certainly not 10 that have made a lasting impact on me. The closest i could come would be
1 Jay Dusard
2 Peter Turnley
3 Jim Herrington
4 Wm Allard
& on that list i've met 3 of them.
I was thinking that a thread on your favourite 10 living photographers might be interesting.
Gosh, there are so many I hardly know where to start. I did note as I was jotting down a list that all of the photographers I was selecting did their best work 50-100 years ago. That's not to say I don't enjoy looking at some modern and contemporary photography, just that I wouldn't take much of it to my proverbial desert island.
Yes, it might be interesting to know the reason why mainly 'old' photography masters are named here.
Is it a sign, the 'new/young' ones are not that well known, perhaps too 'many' of these young ones in the spotlights or just coincidence?
BTW, I am a regular visitor of Aperture's website and subscribed to their newsletter, which I thoroughly check regularly to stay op to date.
Through this, I see a lot of these 'youngsters' and rising talents coming by, and honestly, I have to admit that not all of their work is my cup of tea...
But that's not at all any kind of judgment! Anyway, considered an old beggar, who am I to know?
PS: I do advise anyone to subscribe on Aperture's newsletter, it's very interesting and, by times, 'refreshing'!
At the same time, a lot of what's in the Aperture universe is very topical and socio-political and short on real artistry or any real visual "eye". I consider a lot of it as more reportage and short on the "Fine Art" side of things.
Welcome toAPUGPhotrio!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?