• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Photographers who shot 35mm...

ChristopherCoy

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
3,605
Location
On a boat.
Format
Multi Format
Who are some better known fine art photographers who shot 35mm?

Through reading, watching documentaries, and general research, it seems that most of the "greats" used LF gear. I can only think of two photographers off hand that probably shot 35mm - Winogrand, and Nan Goldin probably.

I'm interested in seeing some work that was produced from 35mm, that is more fine art than documentary.
 
I can start the list for others to follow: my late friends Louie Stettner, Bernie Boston, called the dean of White House photographers, and Sal DiMsrco. All shot primarily 35 mm, although some like Louie began with LF and occasionally used MF. And of course all those photographers that made Leica, Contax and Nikon famous such as Eugene Smith and Ellie Siegel. I’ll let others continue with what will be a very long list.
 
Lee Friedlander has shot mostly 35mm with a Leica throughout his long career, although he also used a Hasselblad Super Wide for a few projects.

Robert Frank used a Leica for most of his well known work (he used small P&S and Polaroid cameras later in his life).

There's no shortage of great fine art photographers who have shot 35mm, including Winogrand as you mentioned, Saul Leiter, Fred Herzog, William Klein, ...
 
Last edited:

Fine art? What Winogrand has to do with it?
I'm not aware of any fine art photographer, LF or else. What is it? Rotten peaches and lousy landscapes with sixteen shades of grey?
 
Alexandr Rodchenko, Daido Moriyama, Masahisa Fukase, Sebastiao Salgado, even Ansel Adams.
 
logan2z said:
Robert Frank used a Leica for most of his well known work (he used small P&S and Polaroid cameras later in his life).
Click to expand...

I'm watching the documentary on him now - "Leaving Home, Coming Home." He seemed like he was a bit rough around the edges. In the first 10 minutes he tells the camera crew "this is $H!+, I can't do it, lets go to Coney Island." LOL
 
Ko.Fe. said:
Fine art? What Winogrand has to do with it?
I'm not aware of any fine art photographer, LF or else. What is it? Rotten peaches and lousy landscapes with sixteen shades of grey?
Click to expand...
Yes, rotten and lousy, you nailed it. Well done. Thanks for stopping by!
 
I have many favorites but I don't think they meet your request of being better known. But Jay Maisel certainly was well known in his heyday and created a wealth of commercial and fine art images. (I don't think there is a wall between commercial and fine art.)

If you haven't seen the documentary about emptying his studio it's truly worth the price.

 
Helen Levitt, Leon Levinstein, Louis Faurer, although the last two may not be considered 'better known'.
 
"well known" and "famous" don't often mean worthwhile. For every one of those there are thousands unknown to Photrio.
 
When documentary becomes fine art - Jane Bown and her Olympus OM (Samuel Beckett is the subject):
 
Duane Michaels, Lee Friedlander, Danny Lyons, Bruce Davidson, William Klein, Colin Corneau, Endre Ernő Friedmann ...
 
I remember Galen Rowell used Nikon 35mm cameras pretty much exclusively.
 
I think that Andreas Feininger was known to use 35mm too - Leicas ?
 
jnantz said:
Duane Michaels, Lee Friedlander, Danny Lyons, Bruce Davidson, William Klein, Colin Corneau, Endre Ernő Friedmann ...
Click to expand...
I mentioned Friedlander and Klein earlier. I thought about Davidson but the OP asked for non-documentary photographers and I thought he fell into the documentary category - as do most Magnum photographers, which is why I've mostly been avoiding them. If we start to include them then this list is going to get pretty long
 
First you have to go back to the thread about what is fine art photography. There are dozens and dozens of photographers who shot (and still shoot) 35mm whose work is considered fine art by many. Although your observation that most of the "greats" used LF, many indeed used MF and 35. And innumerable crappy photographers use all the formats.
 
jawarden said:
Yes, rotten and lousy, you nailed it. Well done. Thanks for stopping by!
Click to expand...

Reading this thread responses makes me even more firm on my description. Fine art is a bogus term.
Jane Bown was taking portraits, not fine art. Klein - fashion commercials. Herzog - street photographer.
Here is no fine art, but landscapes, naturmorts, portraits, documentary, street and so on.
 

oops !
my problem is that I believe all photography is documentary, so. ...its either all of them, or none.
 

I'm not going to stand in anyone's way of compartmentalizing. If you see no fine art (or art without "fine" in front of it) that's your business. I can easily find art in every genre of photography because it's not about the genre in the first place, it's about the artist holding the camera. These compartments mean nothing.

What is a naturmort?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register