Steve Sherman's work is pretty shithot, saw it in Louisville opening last Friday and his work is very good.
If he keeps dedicated and working with the genre , I would put him in the up and coming class of landscape photographers to watch and collect.
Someone already mentioned Howard Bond; I'd suggest you look at his prints of English Churches. Lynn Radeka is also very good: http://www.radekaphotography.com/
Mitch Dobrowner is an up and comer http://mitchdobrowner.com/
While his pictures are stunning to look at he shoots and prints digital. What can we say if we are asked "how can I print like Mitch Dobrowner?
Mit Dobrowner's work is a bit over-worked for me to find satisfying. I know Roman Loranc's work is heavily done too, but somehow its much easier live with.
Mit Dobrowner's work is a bit over-worked for me to find satisfying. I know Roman Loranc's work is heavily done too, but somehow its much easier live with.
I was just looking at his site and feel the same way. Overdone, too much contrast, almost hard to enjoy. The scenes are spectacular though.
I have a question about professional presentation: how many pictures should people include in a gallery/sub-gallery? 34 pictures of storms seemed like a lot to me. Maybe I'm being over critical.