My friend .Cinestills Simplified Color Kit
Might be fog due to an in-camera light leak. Or just a scanning issue...my last 3 color roles have had some discoloration around the edges
2nd and 3rd image.Where's the discolouration around the edges ?
OK and thanks I think you are referring to the change in the brown colour of the tree trunk and the edge of the building. I had wondered about the change in the tree trunk but couldn't rule out a change in the bark or some extra light reaching that part but the building I see now has some clear discoloration2nd and 3rd image.
Coincidentally both frames that are most likely to be severely underexposed.
My friend .
Did you dissolve all the contents of the powder at once with water?
The chemistry of Cinestills Simplified Color Kit, after two weeks, it begins to gradually degrade and crumble, and thus you get results that have some defects and problems,,
Might be fog due to an in-camera light leak. Or just a scanning issue...
Most probably a scanning/digitising issue. Uneven lighting of the negative probably due to lens vignetting (are you sure you are using a small enough aperture on the scanning lens?)
Do a simple test. Make a "scan" of two neighbouring frames on the film (so that the space between frames is in the middle of your scan) and compare the edges of the frames to what you get if you scan one full frame.
Where's the discolouration around the edges ? There seems to be 4 scenes, a lake with hills in the background; tree-lined shot: some buildings; street graffiti with orange coloured car and a landscape with hills Are these the examples
The lake scene and street graffiti shots look very good on my screen, It is more difficult to judge the others as there is a lot of shade and it is difficult to judge colours
Put it like this. Had you shown these in the gallery I would not have seen anything to make me ask questions
pentaxuser
OK and thanks I think you are referring to the change in the brown colour of the tree trunk and the edge of the building. I had wondered about the change in the tree trunk but couldn't rule out a change in the bark or some extra light reaching that part but the building I see now has some clear discoloration
Why only these two frames? If it was the processing why has it only affected these 2 frames? Whatever the reason it suggests that something other than the processing is at work, doesn't it? A scanning problem, possibly?
OP any chance of a digital photo of the problem negs?
pentaxuser
...
pentaxuser
Thanks That's a new code for hello to meJust a hello to a new member.
The photos of the lake and trees, to notice the discoloration as the trees appear to shift colors from green to brown. In person these were all very green trees.
OK This is a real head scratcher I see the gradual change from green to brown but has assumed that this was a real and natural change. If it isn't then it looks to be one of the most perfect but faulty changes I have ever seen
Yes in album 2 most of the trees are brown but this unnatural cast appears to be confined to the trees and in some cases has not spread to far greenery in the hills. I cannot see a magenta cast on the concrete but it may be significant that the shots where there is no green to brown change are the shots that contain no green in the first place
I only print RA4 under an enlarger so really can't comment on scanning or whether anything in the scanner/ scanning software might be interfering
If there is a magenta cast then yes this might affect how green the green material is. In the city building shot the brown seems to be on both edges and the grass looks more neutral grey than I think it should but those buildings in the middle look to be untainted by the magenta/brown In fact in that shot the concrete slabs round what appears to be a plinth behind the grass look too blue. In fact if anything the cast apart from the brown may be too blue in all of the concrete
Under an enlarger I'd try in the brown tree shots to reduce magenta in stages by a couple of units at a time to see what happens. What you need to do in scanning I have no idea
I am unsure what Sirius' ", " means either
pentaxuser
Just a hello to a new member.
You have some (considerable) crossover. It's the kind of problem that rears its head if the developer goes off.The photos of the lake and trees, to notice the discoloration as the trees appear to shift colors from green to brown. In person these were all very green trees. The graffiti starts to go magenta as you approach the left and right edges of the film. You can notice it more in the concrete.
Does crossover affect green the most as it is that colour that seems to have been affected. The green fir trees went steadily brown the closer to the lake buildings they were? In the second album it was the trees again and this time they were almost a chestnut brown colour. Or is that just a random thing in the sense that if the developer has gone off then using it on the next set of negatives might result in it affecting other colours, so next time the trees will be fine but another colour will be affected?You have some (considerable) crossover. It's the kind of problem that rears its head if the developer goes off.
Crossover, by definition, does not affect one color.Does crossover affect green the most
I guess there probably isn't a realistic way for me to test my developer and see if that's the issue. I'll just have to make a new batch when I have some roles saved up.You have some (considerable) crossover. It's the kind of problem that rears its head if the developer goes off.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?