There was a pH increase, not decrease.It has to do with the further dilution allowing more H+ separating and ionizing thus lowering the pH. A good college level chemistry book will explain the mechanism more clearly.
The number of OH- ions increases, but their concentration decreasesAs you diluted it, there was more ionization and the pH went up due to the increase in OH- ions.
moles/litre | pH |
0.1 | 11.12 |
0.01 | 10.61 |
0.001 | 10.09 |
0.0001 | 9.53 |
The patent formula uses sodium metaborate, which I assume is used for buffering. Since I don't have any of it, I make it in the solution with the equimolar amount of borax and sodium hydroxide.Try to adjust initialñ pH with a buffer.
So the simple solution is that when an alkaline solution is diluted, its pH goes up (more alkaline). Who'd have thunk? I need to digest this before I even dream of comprehending "The actual solution is very complex".I gave just the simple solution to this problem.
This wouldn't be true for strong bases I suppose. Weak bases on the other hand, in a solution with all sorts of other chemicals? I guess that is what PE hinted at.So the simple solution is that when an alkaline solution is diluted, its pH goes up (more alkaline). Who'd have thunk? I need to digest this before I even dream of comprehending "The actual solution is very complex".
No, not at all, but I'm away from home and I won't be able to do it for some days.Anon, on a different note, would you mind sharing your XTol modified formula?
If I had removed the probe, cleaned it, put it away with the rest of the meter and tried taking a measurement without recalibrating, then there would be reason to doubt. In my case, the calibration was performed minutes before, I waited the minutes needed for the reading to stabilise and the probe wasn't removed from the solution. After adding water, the reading went up and stabilised soon after the solution became homogenous at almost 8,3. I have very good reasons to believe it is real.pH meter readings often fluctuate slightly with time , I am not convinced that the increase you report is real.
So the simple solution is that when an alkaline solution is diluted, its pH goes up (more alkaline). Who'd have thunk? I need to digest this before I even dream of comprehending "The actual solution is very complex".
Well, I'm back home, so I can post my modified formula, along with some general information. It is based on the formula found in patent US5853964A, example 1, page 5 of 7 and here are the modifications made:Anon, on a different note, would you mind sharing your XTol modified formula?
Sodium Hexametaphosphate | 2g |
Sodium Sulfite | 85g |
Borax | 2,77g |
Phenidone | 0,2g |
Sodium Metabisulfite | 3,5g |
Ascorbic Acid | 10,67g |
Sodium Hydroxide | 3g |
Water to make | 1l |
Target pH | 8,2 |
Well, I'm back home, so I can post my modified formula, along with some general information.
Well, yes and no. If I use tap water with any solution containing sulfite, or carbonate, it will become cloudy within minutes. I could use deionised water, which is cheap, but IMHO hexametaphosphate is more convenient, that's all. It takes less space and 1kg is more or less a lifetime supply.If you forego the iron/copper sequestering properties of DTPA anyway, is it even necessary to add the Hexametaphosphate ?
Thanks for the info, wasn't aware of that. Now, the question I have is what effect would different quantities of Phenidone have? Obviously, too little wouldn't be enough, but is there a threshold above which there would be no difference at all? Or would there be side effects?Also, there a several resources about conversion between Dimezone-S and Phenidone, and the most common consensus I found was that two units of Dimezone-S can be substituted with one unit of Phenidone.
This would be tough to say, since I don't have any real Xtol at hand and, so I can't make any side by side comparisons. That said, I've tried some films with this developer, following Kodak's times for Xtol and my methodology and characteristic curves can be found in this thread. The characteristic curve for TMax 400 nearly met the ISO criteria, it had slightly higher contrast. Slight deviations like that can IMHO happen in an amateur's lab, perhaps half a degree off. The one for (expired) APX100 met the ISO criteria for an ISO speed of 64. Obviously, I have to make more tests with other (fresh!) films, but so far it seems that it behaves reasonably close to Xtol. Sharpness and granularity are very nice too.Can you confirm, that your XTol version behaves the same as the original product, especially with respect to development times?
There is a lot of conflicting information about Phenidone vs. Dimezone-S out there, see e.g. this thread here. Recommended conversion factors are all over the place, anywhere from 1:1 all the way to 1:2. There may or may not be much of an effect from changes in Phenidone/Dimezone-S amount, and the effect may be pH dependent. So I guess a small set of test is all that's needed to find the optimum amount.Thanks for the info, wasn't aware of that. Now, the question I have is what effect would different quantities of Phenidone have? Obviously, too little wouldn't be enough, but is there a threshold above which there would be no difference at all? Or would there be side effects?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?