What do you like about the KX more than the K2.?Hello all.
This is my first post and seems apt as a loyal Pentaxian to start off in this thread.
I have a few Pentax bodies.
I iked using the K2 and ME.
This was until I got a KX which has been the best SLR that I have used.
I prefer the larger K-series of cameras over the M-series, although the ME has a better viewfinder.
I also use an MZ10 and SFXn. I prefer the chunkier SFXn even if it's a large, noisy beast.
I did consider an MX and even an LX, but can't justify the prices when the cameras that I have are doing the job.
If I were to buy another film camera with an LX budget then I will likely check out a 645.
So, KX gets my vote.
What do you like about the KX more than the K2.?
Thank You
Hello all.
This is my first post and seems apt as a loyal Pentaxian to start off in this thread.
I have a few Pentax bodies.
I iked using the K2 and ME.
This was until I got a KX which has been the best SLR that I have used.
I prefer the larger K-series of cameras over the M-series, although the ME has a better viewfinder.
I also use an MZ10 and SFXn. I prefer the chunkier SFXn even if it's a large, noisy beast.
I did consider an MX and even an LX, but can't justify the prices when the cameras that I have are doing the job.
If I were to buy another film camera with an LX budget then I will likely check out a 645.
So, KX gets my vote.
A few small things the KX has over the K2 for me:
One can see the aperture in the viewfinder;
Don't have to depress a small button to turn the shutter speed dial.
Both of these make the KX that bit quicker to operate.
Just that little bit more convenient.
Welcome aboard!
The KX is a fine camera for sure!
BTW, the revised K2 DMD adds the aperture in the viewfinder as well as motor drive option.
Thanks.
I didn't know that about the K2 DMD.
That model's actually quite pricey here where I live so I never considered buying one.
I suspect that the motor drive is probably crafted out of Unobtanium.Thanks.
I didn't know that about the K2 DMD.
That model's actually quite pricey here where I live so I never considered buying one.
Over the years I've seem only a few motor drive bodies and drives for Spotmatic F, ES and ESII and K2MD, usually at collector meets, with prices to match. The ME and MX were the first generation with build winder or drive capability in all bodies?
I've been looking around for a nice Pentax KX and there are certainly far fewer of those around on the usual sites than Nikons. I have to assume that means they sold in much smaller numbers. I'm not even sure why I want to try one, I've got more than enough cameras already. GAS is a terrible thing...In the era of 1970s and 1980s and 90s dominated i guess mostly by Nikon and then Canon..............well i guess i know the answer.
I suppose Pentax was not very common with PJ, Sports and News photographers.?
Did Pentax have an AF camera back then.?
Thank You
Pentax’s development of automated features like ‘program mode’ and AF were fairly well in time with Canon and Nikon. They had a early AF camera—the ME-F—that came out in 1981, but that used a system that they didn’t maintain. After that the ‘real’ AF system came out in 1987 with the SFX (I believe), and those AF lenses still work on current Pentax digital cameras.
I've been looking around for a nice Pentax KX and there are certainly far fewer of those around on the usual sites than Nikons. I have to assume that means they sold in much smaller numbers. I'm not even sure why I want to try one, I've got more than enough cameras already. GAS is a terrible thing...
That makes sense, although I don't see a ton of MXs for sale either, relative to the number of FM/FM2/FM2Ns.The production run on the KX was very short - like the Nikkormat FT3, likely influenced by the Olympus OM1 and the trend to go smaller. The KX was replaced by the MX and the FT3 by the FM.
In the era of 1970s and 1980s and 90s dominated i guess mostly by Nikon and then Canon..............well i guess i know the answer.
I suppose Pentax was not very common with PJ, Sports and News photographers.?
Did Pentax have an AF camera back then.?
Thank You
That is because (most) people in the market for Pentax were buying MEs rather than MXs.That makes sense, although I don't see a ton of MXs for sale either, relative to the number of FM/FM2/FM2Ns.
That's exactly why I like itthe MX was looked at as an ME without auto exposure.
Like Nikon late model Pentax lens without an aperture ring are not backward compatible with most if not all film bodies. I rather like the SF1N, it is next in line for walk at the Zoo.
Wow.........you have had that for a long time now.I got my first Pentax Spotmatic back in the late 1960s and added a lot of accessories in the next few years. In the mid 1970s I was able to get a hold of a Pentax Spotmatic II Motor Drive Set 250. I still have 3 Spotmatics as well as an ESII I picked up in 1978. I try and run at least a couple of rolls through them each year so they are not neglected in the cabinet.
View attachment 289117
A long time and it still works. I was in a camera store in Vancouver in 2004 and they had a shelf with all the Pentax Spotmatic accessories for the motor drive unit, film loader 250, relay pack, power pack and 10 meter extension cords. I took everything they had and haven't had any regrets. The sales guy was happy to help me carry it to the car and free up a good chunk of shelf space.Wow.........you have had that for a long time now.
You must be living right.A long time and it still works. I was in a camera store in Vancouver in 2004 and they had a shelf with all the Pentax Spotmatic accessories for the motor drive unit, film loader 250, relay pack, power pack and 10 meter extension cords. I took everything they had and haven't had any regrets. The sales guy was happy to help me carry it to the car and free up a good chunk of shelf space.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?