Dan Fromm said:When I went shopping for my first SLR, I found stop-down metering an, um, impediment to progress. I fully appreciate that it can be lived with.
I spent 1970 in the US Army in Germany. Most of my fellow soldiers took their snapshots with Spotmatics, which were then the least expensive nice camera in the PX. I don't know whether it was due to the users or the cameras, but enough of the Spotmatics I was acquainted with to notice had shutter failures.
Donald Qualls said:That adapter is redundant on a Spottie, though.
cao said:I'm not absolutely sure, but I think that may apply to only the Spot-F which uses a nulling bridge. The Spot II requires 3ua through the galvanometer to center it. I think the other non-F Spotties are the same. Won't the meter current for given potentiometer and photocell values increase with the battery voltage?
dr bob said:You are correct that bridge circuites require a minimum current for operation. However at null that current flows equally through both legs of the bridge.
cao said:I am having trouble convincing myself. I think there will be 15% greater current through the meter with the Ag cells. So the meter should read slightly higher. Maybe setting the meter's hairspring tension to center at 3.4ua would work. In short, why is the meter current not linearly dependent on the supply voltage?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?