It saves having a separate lever on the camera--less manufacturing cost. Has nothing to do with a benefit to the photographer or any technical reason.I'm ignorant on the MX. What is the idea of the self-timer lever actuating also the automatic diaphragm. It does not hurt, but I do not see the benefit or a technical reason.
This is going to sound slightly crazy perhaps, a longshot at best.
I want to MODIFY my MX to have a DoF preview.
I may in the near future have access to metal parts fabrication and other associated tooling. I have a bum camera body (also an MX) which can be used to test any prototype design I come up with, but I am limited in understanding on what mechanisms are involved in triggering the diaphragm to close independent of the shutter, having access to only the service manual for the MX. Has anyone ever had such a crazy thought? Any insight and advice is welcome, I hereby place my idea on the table for all to offer their $0.02
Well then. That simplifies things. In all the material I've read on the body I can't recall ever seeing that. I thought it was an innovation that was added to the LX after the MX's production run had ended.
Innovation? Older cameras are more likely to have DOF preview than newer ones. Not an innovation but a necessity on some older cameras that can only meter stopped down. Worse some require you have to manually stop the lens down before you take the shot.
This is how I do depth of field preview with my Pentax ME-Super camera:
Press and hold the lens release button.
Turn the lens as if to take it off the camera but stop before it comes off.
The lens stops down to the selected aperture and the result may be seen in the viewfinder.
Turn the lens back so it mounts securely on the camera with a little "click".....shoot!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?