I decided to purchase a ME Super for the extra shutter speed stop. This one is mint with the protective plastic still on bottom plate. It also has a slightly larger 50mm which I wanted as I felt the 1.7 was not feeling very ergonomic. I may even try a 1.2 later. It needs new foam for the mirror and was thinking of buying a 2mm sheet so I have some on hand for other cameras. The meter reads the same as the ME so I assume they are working properly. I will compare tjem agains otjer meters amd will do a table top studio shoot of charts and things for testing. the f1.4 lens that came with it has the slightest bit of haze on the last element. I hope it doesn’t effect the performance that much.View attachment 325291
View attachment 325292
I decided to purchase a ME Super for the extra shutter speed stop. This one is mint with the protective plastic still on bottom plate. It also has a slightly larger 50mm which I wanted as I felt the 1.7 was not feeling very ergonomic. I may even try a 1.2 later. It needs new foam for the mirror and was thinking of buying a 2mm sheet so I have some on hand for other cameras. The meter reads the same as the ME so I assume they are working properly. I will compare them against other meters and will do a table top studio shoot of charts and things for testing. the f1.4 lens that came with it has the slightest bit of haze on the last element. I hope it doesn’t affect the performance that much.
View attachment 325291
View attachment 325292
That is the most beautiful Super I have ever seen! Congratulations! You chose wisely and was lucky to get the right offer at the right time.
They say it is reliable, but while you could set the right exposure while looking through the viewfinder, I was dissatisfied that you didn't then have a clue what the F-stop and shutter speed were. I understand some people counted clicks (no thanks), but I always had to take the camera down from my eye for a few seconds to check before raising it again for the shot. Might as well have used an external meter. The KX and of course the LX, with full info viewfinders, were vastly better. The K1000 was the result of a team told to make the cheapest possible K-mount camera in the shortest possible time, so they took the already budget KM and removed features. Hard to understand the K1000 cult following today.I can’t understand why anyone wouldn’t like the K1000, but to each his own.
Unlike the K1000, at least the MX told you what shutter speed you were at, and your aperture too.The MX is manual only, and it's light, but I've never loved mine -- I find the shutter speed dial stiff and difficult to turn, and I don't care for its LED display, which is basically a glorified center-the-meter system like on the K1000.
.. Hard to understand the K1000 cult following today.
..
I haven't given much thought to an LX... I'd probably buy one if money was no object, but they're expensive, troublesome, and Eric @ Pentaxs.com no longer repairs them. I don't care that much about the hybrid mechanical/electronic shutter (honestly I rather like electronic), and the way I see it the K2 does 90% of what the LX does for 30% of the price. But I think both would exceed the light weight that the OP is looking for.
There’s a reason for that. He’s seen more and more broken ones, does not know how to fix them anymore with the limited supplies he has left. They have become the Contax T2 of SLRs.
It’s why I sold off mine, it was starting to get flaky.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?