Pentax Digital Spotmeter reason for cost?

Dennis-B

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
482
Location
Southeast Michigan
Format
35mm
I found a Pentax digital, converted by Zone VI, a couple of years ago at a local shop. I already had a Sekonic L508 and a Soligor Digital Spot. I compared all three, and couldn't find any real differences between any of the three. Last year, at an antique store, I found a Zone VI-converted Soligor Digital Spot for $65, too good a deal to pass. I did another comparison between the four, and they're too close to tell any differences.

A had Minolta and Soligor analogue spot meters, and they always served me well. When I unloaded my film equipment a few years back, they went with it.

As a few others mentioned, the Pentax digitals have achieved cult status.

I often go out with my Hasselblad, and carry the Pentax. Most folks have no idea what the meter is, other than maybe a digital camera.
 

CMoore

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,191
Location
USA CA
Format
35mm
Eric Rose said:
However the rules of supply and demand rule.
Click to expand...
Yeah, i am not sure why this is so hard to understand.
It is the same reason Leo Fender era Fender amps cost more than CBS era.
Why air-cooled Porsches are "worth" more than liquid cooled.
Why the Nikon F2AS costs more than the F2.
They did not have that much competition to begin with and all these years later, they still do not. A modern day Sekonic spot costs a lot and does way more stuff.....like a Digital SLR, it can seem overly complex.
They basically do one thing and they do it well, and most people have all the other (light meter) angles covered and just need a spot.

I have a Soligor (digital) spot that i need to send to somebody for Service/Calibration. I have never used it, and it would be nice to give it a try.
 

rubbernglue

Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2013
Messages
177
Format
Multi Format
I didn't know it was particularly expensive, just a bit hard to find.. At the time I was traded a large format camera (2014) I had my eye for a L-558 or the Gossen Starlite (a "Minolta spotmeter F" followed along the LF camera but I found it too bulky and plasticy and had like 1000 buttons). The starlite too expensive and not really good enough for the price, and too the Seconic with spotmeter functionality turned out too bulky I suddenly found a very nice Pentax Digi Spotmeter for about $100 so I bought it and a mint Seconic L-358 for another $50, so I can use them separately for each occation. I use the Pentax pretty much only for LF, but I like it very much, not too bulky and does not drain its batteries (and uses the right ones!)
It's a well enginered piece, well built in high quality, I can understand why it costs a little more. just after I bought the Pentax meter though I was offered yet another one for even less money
 
Last edited:

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,564
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
I have several meters(probably too many) but, none are easier to use or more intuativefor Zoe-System work than the Pentax -1 degree spotmeter
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,478
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
Things only cost more if one is foolish enough to pay more.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,956
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I think we have a skewed outlook on this.
At the time that the Pentax Digital Spotmeter was current, used, high quality products tended to be much closer in price to new products than they usually are now. Our sense of "normal" has been affected by the disruption in the photographic market. We expect the prices of used items to have fallen precipitously, so we are surprised when some items maintain their prices.
 

Nokton48

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
2,951
Format
Multi Format
I'd agree with that. I'd wager when people were dumping their film equipment fifteen years ago, this meter could be more easily found cheaply.
Times change, some people are tired of digital. So prices are back up on some film related items.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,253
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
I've had them practically given to me. I have sold them all. I use old Minolta incident meters, The old days, Kodak would print suggested settings on the 120 backing paper. Worked great.
 

Arklatexian

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2014
Messages
1,777
Location
Shreveport,
Format
Multi Format
Well put Pioneer. I bought mine from Fred Picker at a time that I did not know that AA used one. Fred sold me the meter. Using it has kept me from wanting to sell it. However if you don't want to buy anything that AA or Fred used, then don't buy one. It is as simple as that. But then don't mistake supply and demand for "greed".......Regards!
 

Deleted member 88956

Good point, and reason why just as good a meter can be had for so much less. Of course when you get GASed up, then you end up with marvels like Minolta Auto Spot 1 , then the 2 (I like the 1 much better as it is bigger, meaner, and I can't stop thinking why so much going on just to show a light level). I also like the Pentax Spot V, but normally use the Minolta Spot F.

Pentax digital has a following as it is a featured meter in many books and articles, so I suppose you either get things "right" and get one or get another and you're never sure if you ... got it ... well, I don't got one and ... I got it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Deleted member 88956

chriscrawfordphoto said:
Ansel Adams used one, so every large format landscape photographer thinks he needs one. They're not rare by any means, but the prices are kept artificially high by dealers because people are dumb enough to pay the prices they demand.
Click to expand...
Exactly.
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,564
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
for Zone System workers it's simply the most efficient.
 

Deleted member 88956

RalphLambrecht said:
for Zone System workers it's simply the most efficient.
Click to expand...
It's been advertised as such for sure. Most any meter can be mastered though to same efficiency, but it partly depends how complicated one wants to get with Zone System. I don't believe the price of Pentax Digital has anything to do with ZS efficiency, it's a cult device more than anything.
 

CMoore

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,191
Location
USA CA
Format
35mm
I guess some of the later day film cameras had a spot meter built in.? (of some type)
Forgive my trespass...I had to check the forum we are in.....100% analog. So we cannot discuss digital light meters.?
If not, then how many spot meters were ever made.?
I think Minolta made one.?
I have a "digital" (display) Soligor that i need to send to somebody for Calibration.
And there is the Pentax.
Any thers of note.?
Compared to ALL the different types of reflective and incident light meters before the digital age, what percentage of those were Spot. I would think a pretty small percentage.?
I would think that is what makes them expensive.?
Plus, a modern day Spot Meter is quite costly...isn't it.?
Thanks
 

Deleted member 88956

Minolta made at least 3 (kind of 4 if you count Spot F and M as separate), Sekonic made at least one + multiangle versions, Gossen made several with 1 degree capability by either direct or through an accessory, Pentax made several over the years, Soligor and all derivatives base on same design with analog then digital display, and add to those all versions with small angle attachments and i think 5 degree still qualifies as spot. Then you had the Weston Ranger 9 with rather wide 18 degree view but still quite useful for Zone System (and a historically important one for Weston too as it was nothing like they had built before or since).
 

Alan Edward Klein

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2017
Messages
9,281
Location
New Jersey formerly NYC
Format
Multi Format
My Minolta Autometer IIIf has a 10 degree attachment for metering reflected light. Minolta considers that a "spot" reading. I don;t use the Zone system; I shoot 120 roll film. So it's OK for my uses although switching from reflected to ambient or the reverse is a pain because you have to swap elements. I use the 10 degree reading like you would use center-weighted readings in a film SLR or DSLR.
 

4season

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
1,915
Format
Plastic Cameras
$300-350 sounds like an alright price to pay for one if you need it. It's super-useful for evaluating the contrast range of a scene with it's readout in Exposure Values rather than f-stops and shutter speeds.
 

Deleted member 88956

Perfect, Zone System is often a waste of time as not that many scenes actually require ZS to make the best of it, especially for someone who is good at evaluating tonal range of a scene before even picking up the meter. For times when exposure and development needs to be fine tuned for best possible outcome, or more importantly for as easy a printing time as possible, ZS is in and for that spot meter comes in really handy.

The point of this discussion was about high pricing of Pentax Digital Spot, but there are alternatives at far lower price point that afford same control over the process. Yours is a generally good way to cover most scenes more than adequately without getting too far into nit picking one value over another, or to put it another way: employing way too much form over function.Still, ZS can be used in any situation if one so chooses.
 

Deleted member 88956

4season said:
$300-350 sounds like an alright price to pay for one if you need it. It's super-useful for evaluating the contrast range of a scene with it's readout in Exposure Values rather than f-stops and shutter speeds.
Click to expand...
Isn't it a matter of adjusting how you interpret your meter? No need for EVs to apply ZS principles as they are meant to be, for same level of control.
 

faberryman

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
6,048
Location
Wherever
Format
Multi Format
Except that they really aren't that expensive when compared to current meters with the same capability.
 

Nokton48

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
2,951
Format
Multi Format
Ya'll go ahead ahead and use what you are going to use. I've got plenty of choices, myself. Enjoy using what you have already. Fred Picker had a giant rubber stamp he used to answer an overload of countless questions. The rubber stamp said "TRY IT"
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
51,956
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
CMoore said:
So we cannot discuss digital light meters.?
Click to expand...
No problem whatsoever.
Digital image capture, digital file manipulation and digital printing are the subjects that have their own sub-fora.
And things like "digital tripods" and "digital camera straps" are just silly.
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,022
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
I have both Pentax spot meters and have used various other meters such as Luna Pros. What attracts me to the Pentax Digital Spot Meter is less moving parts -- in particular no needle to mess up.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…