The quality of the prints was what I have come to expect from Penn. If I recall correctly there was some blur to the subject, maybe trying to indicated motion. It could have been a longer ambient exposure combined with strobe. She had an unusual physique and I don’t think the photos were meant to be straightforward. I’ll have to go back to the book and take another look.
I don't understand her physique, per Penn, vs her images on her several websites. Did she change profoundly? Are those the same person? I guess I'm asking about the online photos Vs the prints.