It depends. Sometimes they screw in. Sometimes they just slide on and stay put with friction. Sometimes they slide off when they're supposed to stay put and annoy the heck out you.
I'm not sure. There is that Zeiss-Ikon screw-on sync connector, but I do not know whether it is based on/compatible with a PC connector
There are at least two models of male PC-based connectors that got a rim at the tube and need a larger than normal hole to fit in. They are made for flashes with a latch that catches that rim.
My cord has a locking barrel, but none of the sync cables on any of my lenses from my polaroid 600SE, copal polaroid lens or any of my LF lenses have a compatible locking port. I'll just stick to the friction mount and make sure I check the connection each time :-|
The only PC cords I have which lock on securely are those for my Koni-Omega 6 × 7 RF cameras. I wish all cameras using PC cords had a screw-on provision.
It depends. Sometimes they screw in. Sometimes they just slide on and stay put with friction. Sometimes they slide off when they're supposed to stay put and annoy the heck out you.
The design is flawed. I am for ever squeezing the outer ring back in together, but they always manage to slowly spread apart, which results in miss fires.
Is it worth while getting the ones with the screw collar? Does this improve connectivity?
That screw only makes sense if the female connector is threaded too. I have so far not come across any threaded PC connectors and I only got two flashes (out of many) that got a connector with a latch.
Concerning the spreading of the tube, Paramount makes special tools to re-form that tube. (One could make such tool onself.)
Ahh, yes, duct tape seems to be a staple of mine (& rubber bands to hold the whole shebang together). But, invariably, I still manage to some how get the cable/trigger caught and pulled out, which usually results in deforming the plug. Sigh.....