You can see the last portfolio, On My Doorstep, at the Library of Congress. It's in the Madison Building, if memory serves me well, which is across Independence Ave. from the main building. There's a tunnel which connects the two buildings under the street.rhphoto said:I'm wondering where one could view original prints of Paul Strand. ....For any not familiar with Strand's silver prints, they are, I believe, the most perfect jewels ever created on photographic paper.
peters said:I'm sure that you can find some hanging in the permanent collection of the MOMA.
Peter
peters said:Todays front cover of the NY times has an article that the main donor to the museum has walked away because he thinks the museum is in too many places.
rhphoto said:I'm wondering where one could view original prints of Paul Strand - I realize they are all owned these days either by private collectors or by museums. The last time I can recall a show of his work was one that toured the country more than ten years ago. Perhaps the curators of his photographs are concerned that any more exposure to UV will further degrade them. (The lighting in this show was very dim). For any not familiar with Strand's silver prints, they are, I believe, the most perfect jewels ever created on photographic paper. Particularly the work done in Gaspe, New England and the Southwest. To me, these prints are the absolute benchmark of what the medium can deliver. The latest book about Strand was of gravure prints, made from very early negatives. Of course, gravures can stand to be exposed more, and are not as "valuable" as the silver prints, some of which are one of a kind. Anyway, I live within a day's drive of NYC, where I guess one would have the best chance of getting a viewing.
Those were neither a scam, nor work prints, I assume. Paul has always chosen to make dark prints. I once questioned him about it, but never received an answer I was comfortable with.peters said:David and everyone else. It is more than likely that many Galleries in NYC have Strands. It is also most likely that they reside in boxes on a shelf. I would definately check the magazine Photograph. Alot of the galleries list the artists they carry. On the otherhand it is questionable if they will let you see them other than having a strong interest to buy them. Some of the Gallery owners are very cool. Others I'd rather not even talk about much less even go into. However a little diplomacy goes a long way.
Just as aside: Just last year I saw an exhiblt of Paul Caponigro prints here in Ct. It was always a known fact that he is one of the great printers in Photography. I was abso;utely shocked to see that the prints; about 15-20 had been extremely overprinted and what seemed to me really dark. This was in a public library and it was a little dark in there but...... they WERE really dark and I've been curious ever since as to what was up with that. Since prints were for sale I'm wondering what the story was. I wouldn't have bought any. Yet I own CAponigro books where the prints just glow right in the book. Was this a scam to make money. Who knows? Work prints?
Regards Peter
SLNestler said:Those were neither a scam, nor work prints, I assume. Paul has always chosen to make dark prints. I once questioned him about it, but never received an answer I was comfortable with.
If you look at original prints by some of Paul's mentors, Minor White and Ansel Adams, I believe you would think them overprinted, as well.
John Szarkowskli has noted that often, later in their careers, the great photographers tend to print darker and contrastier, with less delicacy. It's a surprising phenomenon.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?