copake_ham said:Going back to OP.
I look at it this way.
I'm Paul and I'm thinking:
"My film negatives-based, traditional handmade prints command $1200. Making those prints takes a heck of a lot of my time.
Buyers are increasingly indifferent to print quality and will pay that sum or close to it regardless.
Shooting digital and using inkjet will increase my work throughput tremendously.
So, SHOW ME THE MONEY!"
dancqu said:Paul sells silver gelatine prints up to 9 1/2 x 11 1/2. All
sizes, $1200. Up from last years $1000. He prints on Forte
Fortezo Grade three. Big news is his going digital. He claims
he can no longer secure any of that paper. He has used
it for many years.
So, there won't be any more silver gelatine from Paul.
When they are gone they are gone. If you've been
yearning for one of his on Forte prints now is the
time to send in that $1200 bucks. Dan
paulr said:well, I actually am Paul, and that's not quite what I'm thinking.
I don't find buyers to be increasingly indiferent to print quality, although I do find them increasingly open minded about what kinds of prints they'll consider.
And while I would like to say my prints "command" $1200, at the rate that I sell work, it would be more accurate to say that they ask for it very, very quietly.
I also have yet to own a digital camera. I don't think they're evil, but at this point in history, for what I can afford, I get much better quality from film ... from a 4x5 and a (borrowed) hasselblad, both older than I am.
I made the investment in digital printing because i was working on an artist's book project, and it seemed like the ideal medium. This was right around the time that Forte became unavailable. I was uninterested seeking out and learning a new silver paper, since in all probability it would meet the same fate ... so I took the plunge and learned to print in ink.
What keeps me printing in ink, even though my silver paper is on the market again, is that I love the prints.
Because of the book project, I've had the opportunity to reprint an entire body of work that had previously been done in silver. To my tastes, about half the time, I like the ink print better. About a quarter of the time I like the silver print better. And about a quarter of the time it's a tossup. Five years ago, I would have found this impossible to imagine. But here i am saying it.
Your results could be different. This is in the context of one body of work, and my personal feelings about it. It still amazes me, because I was very proud of most of those silver prints.
I still have all my darkroom equipment. And I miss using it. But It's been a couple of years since I've actually been compelled to make a darkroom print. I don't feel like I've jumped ship, or become something else ... I've just expanded my toolbox to something that's working better for me right now.
As far as "show me the money" ... just like before, I'm consuming a whole lot more than I'm bringing in. That's not likely to change unless Jon Cone shows me how to print up some $50 bills.
copake_ham said:... he said then she said ....
Seems as if this is a strange web site to advance that theory ...
copake_ham said:Seems as if this is a strange web site to advance that theory.
Oh, and it also means your work throughput is now much faster - right?
Like maybe the OP was a "shill" and figured folks here would rush for the last chance to get a "real" Paul R.?
I live in NYC - want to buy a bridge to Brooklyn?
John McCallum said:do understand Paul that not everyone on apug is a loser, playing a zealot to get attention.
Most here welcome anyone who is film friendly and puts themselves out there with serious effort in their photography.
Hope to see you around.
dancqu said:Paul sells silver gelatine prints up to 9 1/2 x 11 1/2. All
sizes, $1200. Up from last years $1000. He prints on Forte
Fortezo Grade three. Big news is his going digital. He claims
he can no longer secure any of that paper. He has used
it for many years.
So, there won't be any more silver gelatine from Paul.
When they are gone they are gone. If you've been
yearning for one of his on Forte prints now is the
time to send in that $1200 bucks. Dan
paulr said:I raised the price over two years ago, before I even started making the ink prints.
The price difference between the prints is based entirely on rarity. If someone is interested in buying a print from me, I'm completely upfront about which type of print I prefer for that particular image. But my preference will not always be somebody else's.
Shane Knight said:why would anyone would want to invest in a photographer that is not in it for the long run.
Thanks.jimcollum said:Just looked at your work. gorgeous.
What? And break my streak?do you sell it? do you have problems giving up your favorites?
Joe,smieglitz said:I have in my head the idea to actually make two plates of each subject if time permits...one to show and one to go...time hasn't permitted that in the field as of yet. Perhaps inside in the studio this winter it will be a different story.
Joe
Kerik said:While I found the original posting odd, ...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?