Ian, if it's so, why you post this thread?
Blimey.
I can imagine that you have sat and pondered for many nights to decide your plan of action. Full credit to you for acting in the dignified manner in which you have chosen. It says alot about the person inside.
Stoo
I did say the images were a mix of film & digital, for some of my professional work it's unfortunately no longer a matter of choice, the specialist Kodak /Fuji push-process E6 films I used to use aren't manufactured any more.I didn't get that bit about Canon exif if you shot negs. But either way, a slap on the wrist and much more is definitely in order.
Remember I do have full credit for the work where it matters. This guy's Website isn't going to get many hits, and the images are hidden away in ZIP files.
I also have enough power to get him dismissed instantly, but I happen to be on very good terms with his "twin" brother, (they job share) actually he's one of Triplets but the third looks totally different and has all the brains
Legal action costs money, even if I won, which I would he couldn't pay anything in compensation and I'd be out of pocket. Plus I'm not going to take legal action against an organisation I headed for a while, and still work very closely with.
So because this is almost an internal matter it will be slapped wrist, a kick up the backside and a written warning that if it happens again he'll be dismissed. He's made no money from selling my work, if he's got work for himself on the strength of it he's probably not impressed the clients judging by the quality of his own images.
What he's doing is misguided, unethical and immoral - so it has to be stopped.
Ian
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?