Found Parts RF with 48mm lens

Self portrait.

A
Self portrait.

  • 1
  • 1
  • 27
There there

A
There there

  • 4
  • 0
  • 67
Camel Rock

A
Camel Rock

  • 7
  • 0
  • 167
Wattle Creek Station

A
Wattle Creek Station

  • 9
  • 3
  • 159

Forum statistics

Threads
198,960
Messages
2,783,842
Members
99,758
Latest member
Ryanearlek
Recent bookmarks
0
Trader history for OAPOli (4)

Donation to Photrio
% will be donated to Photrio

OAPOli

Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
684
Location
Toronto
Format
Medium Format
Looking for a "for parts" fixed-lens rangefinder with a 48mm lens. Would like to recycle the optics. High likelihood of failure so cheap is best!!
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
1,294
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
I don't but I'm curious - why specifically 48mm?
 
OP
OP

OAPOli

Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
684
Location
Toronto
Format
Medium Format
I don't but I'm curious - why specifically 48mm?

I'd like to put the lens cells into a gs645w body to make circular pictures. Tried 45mm and 50mm (Tessars) and they were respectively to far out (~2mm) or in (~3mm). So maybe a 48mm Tessar (or triplet?) will work.

Found a couple 48mm but one was 5-element with shorter back focus. The other was a triplet with front-cell focusing. The donor shutter is too narrow for those (and for faster & larger lenses).

Kowa Kallo 281/35 or Graflex equivalents are the only ones left I think.
 

darinwc

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
3,146
Location
Sacramento,
Format
Multi Format
Do you need just the lens cells or the shutter assembly as well? And what size shutter? I have an Olympus 48mm f2.8
 
OP
OP

OAPOli

Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
684
Location
Toronto
Format
Medium Format
Do you need just the lens cells or the shutter assembly as well? And what size shutter? I have an Olympus 48mm f2.8

I just need the cells, compatible with a #00 shutter.

I guess your lens is from the 35-S? I tried it and it didn't work unfortunately (short back focus).

BUT I could use it to restore my 35-S. My sample has degraded cement on the rear doublet (and a sticky shutter but I think I can handle that).

At any rate, thank you!
 
Last edited:

darinwc

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
3,146
Location
Sacramento,
Format
Multi Format
Send me your address and I will try to get the Olympus cells to you.
Back to this project.. also consider the lens in the Konica III camera. 48mm f2 in a 00 size shutter. Or the early 47mm super angulon came in a 00 shutter!

Btw, if you happen to have a 75mm f3.5 triplet, I could use the cells.
 
OP
OP

OAPOli

Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
684
Location
Toronto
Format
Medium Format
Send me your address and I will try to get the Olympus cells to you.
Back to this project.. also consider the lens in the Konica III camera. 48mm f2 in a 00 size shutter. Or the early 47mm super angulon came in a 00 shutter!

Btw, if you happen to have a 75mm f3.5 triplet, I could use the cells.

Thank you! I'll send you a PM.

I did test a 45mm f/1.8 from a Minolta 7s but the front cell is too large for the donor shutter. The original 45mm f5.6 is truly tiny. So I suspect most fast lenses won't fit. Too bad because they are more common than simpler/slower lenses.

Kowa Kallo 281/35 or Graflex equivalents are the only ones left I think.
To add to the list there are some Mamiyas with a 48mm f2.8 lens (35-S, 35-S2, Crown) but they likely have triplet lenses. The Kallo seems like a good candidate because the Kowa-H has a Tessar 48mm f2.8 (but with front cell focusing).
 
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
1,294
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
I'd like to put the lens cells into a gs645w body to make circular pictures. Tried 45mm and 50mm (Tessars) and they were respectively to far out (~2mm) or in (~3mm). So maybe a 48mm Tessar (or triplet?) will work.

Found a couple 48mm but one was 5-element with shorter back focus. The other was a triplet with front-cell focusing. The donor shutter is too narrow for those (and for faster & larger lenses).

Kowa Kallo 281/35 or Graflex equivalents are the only ones left I think.

I see, interesting idea. I'm not sold on the idea that FL is such a precise predictor of back focus however. I'd try more of the more common 45mm and 50mm lenses.
 
OP
OP

OAPOli

Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
684
Location
Toronto
Format
Medium Format
I see, interesting idea. I'm not sold on the idea that FL is such a precise predictor of back focus however. I'd try more of the more common 45mm and 50mm lenses.

For back focus I think you are right. In this case the reference point is the shutter which locates the centre of lens. Usually the principal plane is not too far from the centre in those symmetrical(ish) RF lenses? But yes here a couple mm can get you far from infinity, and nominal FL is usually within 5% of true FL. My 45 and 50mm Tessars were about 5mm apart but maybe that was a coincidence.

So... Photrio please send me all your lens cells!! If it works I'll shoot at least one roll per year! (lol)
 
Last edited:
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom