I’m interested in everybody favourite paper surfaces. For years I have used glossy, but am increasingly drawn to the look of Pearl and Satin prints. What do you all favour? Do you stick with a favourite, or do some prints ask for the use of a different surface according to their content? Or do you operate a rule assigning certain types of picture to certain surfaces?
It depends on the paper type and subject. For RC papers, I like Pearl surface and gloss for FB.
For a female portrait, I might choose a semi-matt surface.
Those who like to add colouring might choose a Matt surface.
It varies. Currently I prefer glossy for color and FB b&w for the most part. But sometimes silk for color is also nice, or matte for b&w FB. My carbon prints are a kind of lustre.
I really like the surface of Art300 paper. It's not for photos where sharpness matters, though.
Kodak used to make many interesting paper surfaces. That'll never happen again.
I like Foma's matt paper better than Ilford's. I don't really like glossy rc papers but glossy fb ones are nice. I like all fb paper surfaces more if the print is mounted.
I find the decision between warm tone and neutral tone much more difficult to make than between matt and glossy. For some photos I have to make a work print on both WT and NT, and look at them for a long time before I can make a decision.
Glossy most of the time for prints you hold in your hand or for albums, and matte for reducing reflections of framed prints. Semi-matte and satin is nice for portraits.
I don't remember what it was called, the ugly surface with tiny embossed evenly-spaced round dots. Who used that, and why?
Glossy most of the time for prints you hold in your hand or for albums, and matte for reducing reflections of framed prints. Semi-matte and satin is nice for portraits.
I don't remember what it was called, the ugly surface with tiny embossed evenly-spaced round dots. Who used that, and why?
I still have some Fomatone 532(?) that has a very similar texture. I haven't used it much. So yeah, there's a B&W equivalent. I think Agfa used to have something like this and I think it also existed in Kodak Endura/color.
It's possible, although I know that Fujifilm also had a different texture they called 'canvas', which did in fact resemble a rather artificial canvas weave (so it certainly wasn't this 'silk' finish). It was introduced only a few years ago, but I think it has already been axed as well. Since this is a color product and quite recent, it's likely different from what you mean. I don't know if what I know as 'silk' was marketed as 'canvas' earlier; it's possible I guess, although it doesn't look particularly 'canvasy' to me.
Out of the Kodak line, I'm really only familiar with the 'silk'.
I think nearly all of these are textures (on RC papers) are imprinted on the roll after the paper is coated and dried. So calendered/embossed. At least that's how Fuji does it and how Kodak AFAIK did it, as well. They're not actually different paper bases; they're quite literally 'finishes'.
I am triggered by all the references in this thread to "Matt" surface - I refer to it as "Matte" surface.
This is actually a project that my Darkroom Group is planning - a discussion on what surfaces suit what sort of images.
This one happens to work best with glossy:
Currently looking for a good subject/negative to print up some Ilford Rayon DW .
Some Ilfomar glossy and mat still sits in my paper cupboard along with some Agfa 111 FB.
Gallerie gloss is still one of my favourite papers , I have one box remaining , just waiting to produce some good negatives.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
- I refer to it as "Matte" surface.
