- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
- Messages
- 29,832
- Format
- Hybrid
I think every camera is capable of making great images, in the right hands. It's the people who think a certain camera will make them better photographers who are overrated.
fancy tanks and apparatus to make negatives when a tray serves the purpose and gives better results
I'll trade you Keebler stuff for Kinder EggsWhen I was a kid in the '80s we couldn't get Keebler stuff here, which was annoying because there were so many Keebler commercials during Saturday morning cartoons. People always had to stock up on a bunch of Keebler crap on every trip to Plattsburgh.
Yashica T4 and T5, only popular because Terry Richardson shot one
fancy tanks and apparatus to make negatives when a tray serves the purpose and gives better results
I think every camera is capable of making great images, in the right hands. It's the people who think a certain camera will make them better photographers who are overrated.
The best photographers know how to work with, and exploit, a cameras inherent limits.I agree, however if a camera has inherit limits, those cannot be overcome by the best photographers.
You'd feel differently if you ever taught high school photography in a district which supplied cameras to the students. Not being their own, students were rather sloppy in their treatment of the cameras they were given. Nikons and Canons were constantly in for repairs. Our K1000's kept on working.Pentax K1000. I think it was fine back when it was introduced. It works and cheap. Nowaday people think so highly of it. It's a bottom of the line camera.
Yeah I heard people say it's tough. It's not any tougher than cameras in its time.You'd feel differently if you ever taught high school photography in a district which supplied cameras to the students. Not being their own, students were rather sloppy in their treatment of the cameras they were given. Nikons and Canons were constantly in for repairs. Our K1000's kept on working.
My experience as a teacher says otherwise.Yeah I heard people say it's tough. It's not any tougher than cameras in its time.
Is it tougher than the Minolta SRT series? The Nikon FM? The Nikkormat? And for that matter Pentax brothers and sisters the Spotmatic, KX, KM and the little MX?My experience as a teacher says otherwise.
Even mediocre photographers can and do, that... just need to be smart about the limits of photography and interested in learning them.The best photographers know how to work with, and exploit, a cameras inherent limits.
Not only would most disagree with you, a tray cannot give as consistent results and many film processors.
Is it tougher than the Minolta SRT series? The Nikon FM? The Nikkormat? And for that matter Pentax brothers and sisters the Spotmatic, KX, KM and the little MX?
They survived the abuse of teenagers with no ownership interests in the cameras better than the Nikons, Nikkormats, and Canons we had. I don't believe we had any Minoltas.Is it tougher than the Minolta SRT series? The Nikon FM? The Nikkormat? And for that matter Pentax brothers and sisters the Spotmatic, KX, KM and the little MX?
And as the technician for a university photo program, I agree. Simplicity helps to makes equipment more durable, especially in the hands of students. The fanciest cameras in the world won't help the students if they are non-functional. We had a new instructor who wanted us to buy 4x5s that had too many plastic parts...no way. Even the Tachaharas we had were lousy student cameras. Too weak.My experience as a teacher says otherwise.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?