Maybe you won't be forced into producing "artistic photographic images". Possibly if you keep taking pictures that you enjoy, in time they might just become art. There was a professional photographer in Baton Rouge, Louisiana who, while still a teenager, restored an old sailboat and with his 5x4 old speed graphic went along the coast and into the bayous of South Louisiana photographing the fishermen and their families. Shortly before he died, he appeared on TV and made the following statement: "I just took those pictures because it was fun to do so and now they tell me that they are art". And they are...............RegardsWhen I start producing "artistic photographic images"I'll tell you.
Maybe you won't be forced into producing "artistic photographic images". Possibly if you keep taking pictures that you enjoy, in time they might just become art. There was a professional photographer in Baton Rouge, Louisiana who, while still a teenager, restored an old sailboat and with his 5x4 old speed graphic went along the coast and into the bayous of South Louisiana photographing the fishermen and their families. Shortly before he died, he appeared on TV and made the following statement: "I just took those pictures because it was fun to do so and now they tell me that they are art". And they are...............Regards
An extreme example of that would be the John Waters movie, "Pecker".
To me, exploitative photos are ones taken where the subjects are either incapable of expressing consent due to age, mental infirmity, or other kind of diminished capacity, or where the photographer is aware that the subject would refuse consent if they were aware of the photo being taken.
But do it firstA variation of the Golden Rule is a good guide to ethics: do nothing to others that you would not have done to you.
Was "Migrant Mother" exploitative?
It was, of course, documentary in nature, and therefore might not be considered to be strictly "artistic" in nature.
There are probably some photographs that appear exploitative when they are new, but over time come to be appreciated as illuminating.
OK, anything that exploits the innocent of children, the infirm or mentally ill for starters.
Was "Migrant Mother" exploitative?
It was, of course, documentary in nature, and therefore might not be considered to be strictly "artistic" in nature.
There are probably some photographs that appear exploitative when they are new, but over time come to be appreciated as illuminating.
This photograph is a very good example, as it could be said to be exploitative when taken, but over time it has become a very artistic image.
How about the naked Vietnamese girl running from the Napalm explosions, or the naked children being treated in a Vietnamese hospital?
Then, is photojournalism ever exploitative?
I would call it an expressive or emotional rather than artistic. Remember that the photographer got paid, but the mother likely did not. IDK the actual circumstances.
PE
IIRC, this was taken by Imogen Cunningham while working for the federal government and she made very little profit. She saw what she saw and did her best to convey that woman's unhappy predicament to the rest of the world. Was the image exploitative? Perhaps... but it did a damned fine job of opening others' eyes... didn't it?
No, it was taken by Dorothea Lange.
OK, anything that exploits the innocent of children
Taking pictures of less fortunate people are subject for social documentary to raise awareness, not for "street photography" crapshots.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?