Other than C-41???

Chiaro o scuro?

D
Chiaro o scuro?

  • 0
  • 0
  • 152
sdeeR

D
sdeeR

  • 2
  • 0
  • 174
Rouse St

A
Rouse St

  • 1
  • 0
  • 206
Untitled

A
Untitled

  • 3
  • 2
  • 233

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,196
Messages
2,787,697
Members
99,835
Latest member
Onap
Recent bookmarks
0

Melanie

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2004
Messages
33
Location
LqQuinta,CA.
Format
Multi Format
HI
I like the kodak 400 b/w,I take to my local walmart and they send them out to be developed, takes forever (8 days) but there alwas very nice. I'm alwas surprised to see the detail , but not to much grain. I normally use agfa b/w in a bulk roll but some time buy the kodak b/w for some thing deferent. Have not tried to develop my self, but I have a roll in one of my 35mm, maybe I'll try it first part of next week.
Melanie
 

mark

Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2003
Messages
5,703
Nicole McGrade said:
Sorry, I'm not sure if this is appropriate here, but I have learnt alot in this thread and have this question:

Since I have never developed or printed my own (yet - just another couple of weeks, maybe Santa...), if I limit myself to getting a pro lab to develop and myself to print, will that still give me the control to produce more artistic hand printed images (ie. dodging and burning etc...)?

yes.
 

Nicole

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
2,562
Location
Perth, Western Australia
Format
Multi Format
Melanie said:
HI
I like the kodak 400 b/w,I take to my local walmart and they send them out to be developed, takes forever (8 days) but there alwas very nice. I'm alwas surprised to see the detail , but not to much grain. I normally use agfa b/w in a bulk roll but some time buy the kodak b/w for some thing deferent. Have not tried to develop my self, but I have a roll in one of my 35mm, maybe I'll try it first part of next week.
Melanie

Here's a photo taken with Kodak BW400CN developed and printed at pro lab.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

SuzanneR

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 14, 2004
Messages
5,977
Location
Massachusetts
Format
Multi Format
Nicole McGrade said:
Sorry, I'm not sure if this is appropriate here, but I have learnt alot in this thread and have this question:

Since I have never developed or printed my own (yet - just another couple of weeks, maybe Santa...), if I limit myself to getting a pro lab to develop and myself to print, will that still give me the control to produce more artistic hand printed images (ie. dodging and burning etc...)?

When I first started getting back into b/w I shot Ilford XP2 and the Kodak T400CN, and had them commercially processed. One thing I liked about the process was getting the 4x6's prints. Anyway, when I finally built the darkroom I printed up a number of images, and many printed up beautifully, and some were more difficult to get good prints out of. I have a few rolls that were overdeveloped. Judging by your posts in the gallery, you should be able to make some very nice prints. I do find though, that when you process your own film, results are more consistent, and I go through fewer sheets of paper to get the print where I want it.

Hope Santa brings you that darkroom!
 

Bob Carnie

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
7,735
Location
toronto
Format
Med. Format RF
When I have to print this material , I find the filters setting must be very high to get a good print, I admit once finding the balance I do like the look of these films.
As a previous poster stated this is a dye based C41 film, If you plan to do a serious body of work over a few years , I would be concerned whether the negative will be stabe and printable after 10 years.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom