ORWO TF12d developing

sdeeR

D
sdeeR

  • 0
  • 0
  • 1
Rouse St

A
Rouse St

  • 1
  • 0
  • 14
Untitled

A
Untitled

  • 2
  • 0
  • 36
Today's Specials.

A
Today's Specials.

  • 3
  • 0
  • 37
Street portrait

A
Street portrait

  • 1
  • 0
  • 31

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,171
Messages
2,787,432
Members
99,831
Latest member
wota69
Recent bookmarks
0

JinLing

Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2022
Messages
1
Location
PL
Format
35mm
Hi! I grabbed a random film and don't know how to develop it. I'm in the middle, there are photos on it that I might care about. ORWO TF12d below datasheets:

https://www.filmotec.de/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/V-I-TI-TF12d-e.pdf (tape description)
https://www.filmotec.de/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/V-I-VV-2182-e.pdf (process description according to orwo)
https://microsites.lomography.com/download/fantome-development-guide-en.pdf (process description according to lomography)
https://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php?devrow=15748 (xt-3)
https://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php?devrow=14941 (xtol)

I exposed the film nominally at 50 iso. In the third link, the table is probably pulled to iso 8 and renamed as 'fantome'. The film has an anti-halation layer, but I'm a newbie and I don't know how that relates.
How can I develop and how not?
Will the D76 work and what effect can I expect?
Is it possible to get a replacement for the D97 somewhere in Europe and does the processing in this make any sense in this case?
I read about too much contrast, although I want to get it, but also want readable photos.

Please help!
 
Last edited:

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
As Alan hinted at, the Filmotec film is a high-contrast, high resolution film. With all the inherit issues when seeking pictorial use, for which it is not designed. So forget about any processing advice given by Filmotec.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
I forgot to WELCOME you...


As a "newbie" you picked the worst constellation. A film not designed for pictorial use. I very much doubt it was a good idea of yours for entry into film photography..
 

cmacd123

Subscriber
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
4,314
Location
Stittsville, Ontario
Format
35mm
the sound film is an interesting option, BUT I agree with AgX, for your first attempt on the darkroom, you might find it easier to start with a "regular" film like Ilford HP5+ or Kentmere 400. Times are published for almost ALL developers for "regualar" films. You don't have to try to avoid the extra contrast of a a special purpose Sound recording film, you will find many more posts from folks who use those stocks regularly. In the ORWO range, UN54 at ISO 100 is a "regualr" film. (but ORWO is shaking up their entire Line it seems) Besides HP5+their is FP4+ (125) in the ilford range. Kentmere also makes an 100 speed film. If you really want a slow film - Illford makes Pan-F.
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2018
Messages
982
Location
USA
Format
Traditional
Without careful metering and lighting, sound recording films like TF12d have a very limited ability to record continuous tone pictorial images. Exposing at ISO 50 should place highlights (sky, properly exposed subjects) into a printable range but at the expense of shadow detail when developed in something like D76.

If you're comfortable developing film yourself, snip a few frames from the end of the roll for testing before processing the entire roll to get an idea of the film's characteristics.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom