Yes, I think there are some valid concerns and a great deal of hypocrisy. He wasn't doing anything with the images of young women commercial photographers haven't done for years, and with arguably more grievous results, but his demeanour and lifestyle makes him an outsider, a position communism compounded. I don't find the results erotic, though they are objectifying. I find many of the images very beautiful, which is partly the subject but mainly the aesthetic. Is beauty alone sufficient to justify the means of acquiring them? That's a much bigger discussion. The fact he made his own equipment and never sought to sell them takes the debate into uncharted areas.I'd never heard of him until now. I find his work fascinating too. I've only read a bit about him and seen some photographs, but I see why people would feel conflicted about his work.
I agree that the reaction to the artwork is truer if you don't know the artist. Thing is, whenever something strikes me, I become really curious about the artmaking process, which inevitably leads to reading about the artist's life. And to answer your question, yes, what I think & feel about an image does change. I might still be able to appreciate the technical aspects of it, but I won't enjoy the image the same way.As others have said, a very good question. I would suggest that in viewing the work without knowledge of the artists life gives more of a true reaction to the art. For instance if you viewed a painting with no knowledge of who the artist was and you liked it, but then found it was painted by Adolf Hitler, how can that cancel out your initial reaction to the image?
You bring up many good points. I watched the documentary and I actually feel less conflicted than before about his work. I do find it creepy that he'd go out each day and shoot 100 pictures of women in the street, but he explained that there was a certain order to his chaotic creative process and practice. The thought that kept coming to me was that he was a "loco lindo" (a charming eccentric, for lack of a better translation). In Argentina, we use these words to describe someone who is strange but harmless. I wonder if I'm downplaying mental illness by saying that, but well, it'd be pretentious to discuss a diagnosis. I still find him fascinating and some of his images were really beautiful. In this case, I think the end justifies the means. Oh, something that made me laugh was seeing him handling his photographs haphazardly and then the gallery people using glovesYes, I think there are some valid concerns and a great deal of hypocrisy. He wasn't doing anything with the images of young women commercial photographers haven't done for years, and with arguably more grievous results, but his demeanour and lifestyle makes him an outsider, a position communism compounded. I don't find the results erotic, though they are objectifying. I find many of the images very beautiful, which is partly the subject but mainly the aesthetic. Is beauty alone sufficient to justify the means of acquiring them? That's a much bigger discussion. The fact he made his own equipment and never sought to sell them takes the debate into uncharted areas.
The documentary Tarzan Retired about Tichy is available on YouTube.
Quite right too.I wonder if I'm downplaying mental illness by saying that, but well, it'd be pretentious to discuss a diagnosi
Pre-Colombian Art was produced by societies that ripped out human hearts.
Quite right too.
There's a very wide range of human behaviour that might seem very odd to non-clinicians but would not indicate mh problems to an experienced professional.
Making amateur diagnoses seems to be quite a popular sport,but doing so on the basis of what is essentially hearsay (unevidenced comment and articles on the Internet, I mean) is foolishness.
I've been rather fascinated by Tichy, and delvedinto his story as well as watching his interviews. He was certainly far from an ordinary man, and his experiences of totalitarian government no doubt affected him.
But to say more than that ... No
I've seen some of his prints first hand. Rather extraordinary documents. Oddly moving.
All "diagnoses" of mental health are actually judgments so one need not be an MD to play.
We have Bill Cosby writing a book on fatherhood.
... thirty years ago!
My mistake. Is being dyslexic a good excuseI'm aware of that.
You said:
We have Bill Cosby writing a book on fatherhood.
I don't think he's polishing off a sequel!
You wouldn't want to read my book. Especially if it's handwrittenIt would be a good excuse for taking 30 years to write a book
(I'm also dyslexic, were probably in the majority amongst photographers!)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?