One-Touch vs. Two-Touch Zoom

WPPD25 Self Portrait

A
WPPD25 Self Portrait

  • 7
  • 1
  • 68
Wife

A
Wife

  • 4
  • 1
  • 98
Dragon IV 10.jpg

A
Dragon IV 10.jpg

  • 4
  • 0
  • 92
DRAGON IV 08.jpg

A
DRAGON IV 08.jpg

  • 1
  • 0
  • 59

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,886
Messages
2,766,413
Members
99,495
Latest member
Brenva1A
Recent bookmarks
0

CanonShot

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2009
Messages
23
Location
Amherst, NY
Format
35mm
I've bought a Canon FTbN on eBay and would like to buy
a wide zoom and a long zoom to go with the 50mm, f/1.4.

One choice is a Canon 28-85mm, f/4.0 and a Canon
85-300mm, f/4.5 (both are two-touch zooms).

The other choice is a Vivitar 28-75mm and a Vivitar
75-300mm, f/4.5 (both are one-touch zooms).

What are the pros and cons with respect to handling
a one-touch zoom versus a two-touch zoom? Is one
easier to use, easier to focus, or optically better?

TIA,
Don
 

2F/2F

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2008
Messages
8,031
Location
Los Angeles,
Format
Multi Format
It depends. I find that two touch is fine if you have the time to preset your focal length and then shoot (or use an autofocus camera), but I prefer push-pull for when I need to change the FL a lot, and quickly. In practical use, I prefer push-pull myself, but I also think the drawbacks of two touch zooms have been negated by autofocus. Therefore, I don't mind two touch zooms if I am using an AF camera.

The maximum t stop of the lens will determine how easy it is to focus; not one touch or two touch focusing.
 

fschifano

Member
Joined
May 12, 2003
Messages
3,196
Location
Valley Strea
Format
Multi Format
I have one one touch zoom, a Vivtar Series I 28 to 105. I don't like it. It has a tendency to creep. The focal length drifts too easily. I think the two touch zooms are better in this respect.
 

mudman

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2008
Messages
335
Location
Saratoga Spr
Format
Multi Format
I agree with 2f/2F. with a MF camera, pushpull for the added ability to change focal length on the fly. AF, I tend to like 2 touch more.
 

Russ - SVP

Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2005
Messages
755
Location
Washington
Format
35mm
Vivitar Series 1, 28-90 f/2.8-3.5 or the Kiron 28-105. Both are excellent one-touch zooms.

Kiron Kid
 

phenix

Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2008
Messages
216
Location
penguin-cold
Format
Multi Format
On manual focus cameras with one-touch zooms, you get the focus easier at the longer zoom, than just slide it at the desired focal length. But be careful, there are very few zooms that do not preserve the focus when changing the focal. Between these, if I recall, is a short zoom from Vivitar S1 (Kiron) 28-80mm (or something like that). Although those few zooms are optically beautiful. Or am I wrong, and this is a two-touch zoom? I’m not sure anymore, as I avoided it years ago for this same reason.

As for AF cameras, using a one-touch zoom means to deactivate the AF. Two-touch zooms are best used with AF, as one-touch zooms are with MF.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,231
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Two-Touch is my preference, but that may because I greatly prefer fixed focal length lenses to zooms.

I wonder if there is any correlation between those preferences?

Matt
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,953
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
I use the Canon FD 75-150 and 100-300 zooms they are both one touch, I would prefer two touch because I find that it's difficult to use the trombone action without turning my wrist and knocking the image out of focus.
 

Wade D

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2006
Messages
897
Location
Jamul, CA
Format
Multi Format
I have both types but prefer the two-touch. As mentioned the one-touch tends to creep if not held level. It can be a pain if pointing up or down unless you hold it in position.
 

Jeff Kubach

Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2007
Messages
6,912
Location
Richmond VA.
Format
Multi Format
I have used both, and like them both. But if push came to shove I'll go to two touch zoom. BTW welcome to APUG.

Jeff
 

Galah

Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2009
Messages
479
Location
Oz
Format
Multi Format
What are the pros and cons with respect to handling
a one-touch zoom versus a two-touch zoom? Is one
easier to use, easier to focus, or optically better?

TIA,
Don

I have several of each (some AF, some MF)
The earlier zooms were mostly MF one-touch zooms.

With MF, the one-touch is faster and "easier" to use.

With AF, there is little difference in ease/speed of use.

In the case of both, as the action 'loosens up" due to wear, particularly in the case of lenses with large, heavy, glass elements, there is a tendency for zoom creep :sad: if the lens is not level, and one needs to stop this creep by the careful application of a restraining finger (or whatever).
 

BobbyR

Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Messages
1,262
Location
Minn.
Format
35mm
IF you want precise focus a two-touch is always better.

Depending on the size of your hands, size of lens and lens used; with practice one can use one part of the had for zooming (to a degree) and the other part for focusing.

With practice you will get used to going between actions without thinking.
 

Poohblah

Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2008
Messages
436
Format
Multi Format
I've found that I prefer 1-touch over 2-touch for several reasons including the wonderful DOF scale on many 1-touch zooms. That said, I also don't prefer zoom lenses.

Just personal preference, I suppose.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom