+1 Perceptol 1+2. Maybe JW will share with you his formula but go to the website posted earlier and look up two-bath. You may like Barry Thornton's book "Edge Of Darkness" if you can find a copy. I have taken away more from this resource than any other. It addresses just about every aspect of taking a photograph and developing the film, enlarging and printing, including the aesthetics. Two chapters are devoted to film speed, grain and developing for acutance and all the trade decisions you need to make - your very question here. Barry points out that one needs to be practical about fine grain or no grain on two points: 1. For the film size, and the enlargement size, grain only needs to be mitigated so the print looks like you want at the size you are printing at. Evaluating "grain" of a film/developer combination at 4 times the enlargement you will print is just nutty. 2. No grain means, roughly speaking, no acutance. So if the grain is not a distracting element of the print at the desired enlargement, one would like to retain or produce as much grain as possible to achieve the acutance needed to make the print sharp. Barry also makes a good argument for the 120 film size being capable of producing every bit as good a print as large format at the practical sizes often worked with. Unless you are making murals, you can achieve exhibit quality results with 120. As an exercise in grain, acutance and resolution, I have an APUG album "Freedom Rising" that has an 8x10 photograph scanned, 5 crops made to be at approx. 35mm and just added "crop6" to be approx. 6x6 frame size. Taken on HP5+ developed Perceptol 1+2. The exercise settles no issues, but was fun to take up and until I have time to do multiple developers, dilutions, variations and film combinations, I am sticking to something I can characterize with curves to make exposure decisions reliably, and spend my time shooting.