+1Keep the one you like the best ...
Hi,
I've got two very nice Olympus OM-1 cameras. Since I'm selling one of them, I'm wondering which one to keep of course.One of the cameras has a split image focussing screen, the other one a microprism focussing screen. Apart from that the cameras are identical.
So is there a focussing screen that is considered better/worse than the other one?
Thanks!
I like the screen with the 45 degree split prism that was introduced with later models. IIRC, that may require an adjustment to metering.
The Olympus 1-14 screen has the 45 degree split image.I know Ricoh or Cosina had a focussing screen with a 45-degree split-image, but Olympus' split-images were always horizontal.
Yeap, 1-14 is the one and also is perfectly compatible with the OM-1 or the -2.The Olympus 1-14 screen has the 45 degree split image.
I believe it was a later addition to the line.
I have one installed in my OM-2S, and I really like it.
EDIT: here is the information from the unofficial Olympus OM Sales Information site in its current (new to me) home: http://omesif.moosemystic.net/om-sif/findergroup/focusingscreens.htm
Yeap, 1-14 is the one and also is perfectly compatible with the OM-1 or the -2.
On that note, I liked the Praktica double split screen. It was also at 45 degrees.
Beattie have ceased manufacturing Intenscreens http://www.camerascreens.com/notfound.phpI stand corrected (and better informed). I didn't know about the 45 degree split-image in the 1-14.
I like bright screens to make focusing indoors easier, and I'll also recommend the Beattie Intenscreen.
The screens for Beattie, Maxxum, and AE-1 Program are all equally bright in my estimation, and probably match the scarce "Fine Lumi-Micron" 2-13 screen.
Mark Overton
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?