But I do have issue with low speeds and camera shake. It just might be more magnified because of the smaller frame size?
Since I started darkroom printing I stopped worrying about the grain and sharpness. At the sizes I'm able to print, none of them is an issue
But now I got curious and just scanned one frame where I'm sure I was lower than 1/30. No problem with the shake as far as I'm concerned. Of course, we all have different standards about this. But for what the shutter shake feels like on Pen F (you can literally feel the shock in your hand) and what ends on film, I'm always pleasantly surprised.
(you can click on image for original unsharpened full resolution scan, film is Adox Color Mission 200 so it's grainy)
I own and have serviced and shot with both. Love, love, love the Pen-FT because I am really an SLR kind of guy, and dig the precision framing and focusing even if the finder is kind of dim. With Weincells, I got decent accuracy when shooting C41 color negative film. In operation, the meter is kind of quirky but serviceable. You want crazy grain, try shooting it with Lomo 800 CN - fun.So the two cameras I was looking at are the Canon Demi EE17 and the Olympus Pen FT.
The Pen SLR is a nice camera but -- and it is not just my example, the guys at Analogue Insights said the same thing -- it is LOUD.
As in "BANG" every time you take a picture.
The EE models are super quiet and really good quality. Outdoors with reasonably fast film you can set it at 400 and forget about focus.
I wouldn't be surprised if Analogue Insights claim it is loud. That is perhaps the most boring, slow paced, nyquil laced channel I have ever come across. Starts off sitting in a non-descript barely furnished colourless room. Talks very softly. Wears a lot of turtlenecks. Then eventually gets to show pics of a fence. Good grief that channel is a cure for insomnia.
I'd describe the Pen FT as having an extremely crisp and sharp release. It feels so responsive and is a joy to use.
Here is an excellent, lively review of it
Samarai is a fun half-frame camera worth trying... autofocus, zoom, SLR and horizontal format.
I'd rather have an Olympus Pen but it is fun.
Shutter noise doesn't concern me. My Pentax 67 is louder then this thing.
Since I started this thread, suddenly all the cheap Pen FT cameras sold. All the ones left are way over priced. Who would want to spend 400-500 Canadian dollars on a half frame camera, when I can get a 645 body for less then 300?
Who would want to spend 400-500 Canadian dollars on a half frame camera, when I can get a 645 body for less then 300?
Since I started this thread, suddenly all the cheap Pen FT cameras sold. All the ones left are way over priced. Who would want to spend 400-500 Canadian dollars on a half frame camera, when I can get a 645 body for less then 300?
Roberts has on up on the auction sight for a pretty good deal right now. Less than a Benj.
"The advancing arm is stiff to advance and retract but is fully functional" and the light meter is dead of course. I bet CLA will cost three times more than what the body is listed for.
Nothing that Ronsonol won't fix.
To be fair I got into the system by getting a busted body and a few lenses and then coughing up the dough for a CLA.
Fair enough. I'm avoiding Pen F series simply because over here I have to service my scrap on my own (sending them abroad isn't really economical) and OM-1 is easier for me to service.
PX625/PX13 mercury cells can be replaced with "675" Zinc-Air hearing aid cells and a spacer. I'm yet to see an OM-1 with busted galvanometer. Their light meters usually "die" because of wire corrosion, or contact corrosion in battery chamber. Both are fairly easy to fix. Shutter timing mechanism is also pretty easy to access and clean.
They don't last very long, them zinc cells from what I understand.
Three months for a single cell is acceptable, considering that I get a six-pack for 8$
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?