• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Old Tri-X (exp 1964 and 1993)

Vertical WPC

A
Vertical WPC

  • sly
  • Jan 30, 2026
  • 3
  • 1
  • 38
Conversations.

A
Conversations.

  • 8
  • 4
  • 82

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
202,051
Messages
2,834,444
Members
101,093
Latest member
Photorjp
Recent bookmarks
0

pstake

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 5, 2005
Messages
728
Format
Multi Format
From different sources, I was given expired bulk rolls. One came in a Lloyd bulk loader and the outside as marked "Tri-X, use b4 Aug. 1964."

The other was still in its original tin and packaging, marked expired June 1993. It's a 50-foot roll.

Question: Both dev'd films are marked Kodak Safety Film 5063. I know this was on Tri-X in the 70s / 80s ... but would it have been on there in the early 60s?

I rolled some of each onto cassettes and here are the results. It looks like the really old 1960s-stuff is unusable, but the stuff from 1993 looks good at ISO 100 dev'd in undiluted D-76.

First the oldest stuff ... I metered at ISO 25 and then bracketed. Including an underexposed frame here because it demonstrates the reason I can't use it.

Anybody know what causes that streak on the bottom half? Is it just because it's old film or was this stuff at some point exposed to light?

img228.jpg
Tri-X expired Aug. 1964 exposed @ iso 25, dev'd in undiluted d-76

img227.jpg
Tri-X expired Aug. 1964 exposed @ iso 100, dev'd in undiluted d-76

img217_200ppi.jpg
Tri-X expired June 1993 exposed @ iso 100, dev'd in undiluted d-76

These from 1993 came out mostly great ... but you can see some brownish specs to left of her ... those were on a couple of frames only ... and I'm not sure what they are.

These are all neg scans from v500, no post-processing except to resize.
 

John Shriver

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Messages
484
Format
35mm RF
Second negative I'd say is light-struck.

Third negative has a thumbprint on her neck. So I'll guess the other spots are dirt as well.
 
OP
OP
pstake

pstake

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 5, 2005
Messages
728
Format
Multi Format
It's not dirt. There are bumps on the negative. These were test rolls to see if the film was any good and I wasn't particularly careful about handling. But there are two or three negatives that have those same bumps.

Thanks for pointing out the thumbprint. That's easily remedied and has nothing to do with the age of the film.


Second negative I'd say is light-struck.

Third negative has a thumbprint on her neck. So I'll guess the other spots are dirt as well.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom