Old DD-X == fully developed, but very grainy negs

Sciuridae

A
Sciuridae

  • 2
  • 2
  • 74
Takatoriyama

D
Takatoriyama

  • 5
  • 3
  • 106
Tree and reflection

H
Tree and reflection

  • 2
  • 0
  • 89
CK341

A
CK341

  • 5
  • 1
  • 99
Plum, Sun, Shade.jpeg

A
Plum, Sun, Shade.jpeg

  • sly
  • May 8, 2025
  • 3
  • 0
  • 121

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,628
Messages
2,762,161
Members
99,425
Latest member
dcy
Recent bookmarks
0

MikeM1977

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2005
Messages
110
Location
Madison, WI
Format
4x5 Format
Last year I bought a bottle of Ilford DD-X at a local camera shop. I have a feeling it sat on the shelf for awhile.

I remember the results were pretty good when I first used it. But 9 months passed before I used it again in the past couple weeks. The bottle is about 2/3s full.

Both rolls of film I developed have the right contrast, but the grain is HUGE.

I also read a post on rec.photo.darkroom where somebody else also noticed that old DD-X results in big grain (but normal contrast).

Does this make any sense?
 

Ryuji

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2005
Messages
1,415
Location
Boston, MA
Format
Multi Format
Possibilites:

1. Much of the sulfite is oxidized.

2. The pH of the developer is increased due to sulfonation of hydroquinone.

2 is easy to verify with a decent pH meter. 1 requires a bit of analytical lab work to determine how much of the sulfite is oxidized.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom