I have used the stock solution over a period of 2...3 months without any degradation. For 1+1 dilution I filled small bottles which remained unopened until I use them. They last even longer, more than half a year.
When I suggested Metol as a substitute for Atomal I did so for a number of reasons. Among these are the fact that both chemicals are related in structure and belong to the same Kendall-Pelz group being based on aminophenol. Developing agents such as CD-1 are based on paraphenylene diamine and are in a different group. Their use proposes some different problems which Calbe may have solved with chemicals which do not appear in the MSDS. Another consideration was ease of access and price. The color developing agents may be hard to find and are usually more expensive. If Metol does not produce fine enough grain then Glycin is another possibility. It too is based on the aminophenol structure but is less active than Metol. It is also in the same KP group as Metol. By being less active it probably behaves more like Atomal. But again more expensive and harder to obtain for some in other parts of the world.
No matter what developing agent is substituted for Atomal, it is highly unlikely that the resulting developer will exhibit all the properties of the original Atomal developer.
@Ian - interesting. I'm sure one of my reformulated packets of A49 stated one of the sachets contained CD1. That perhaps is the case for modern Calbe A49, but I don't have access to the MSDS to check.
@gorbas - thanks. Would love a copy of the whole book so not practical - but as mentioned, if anyone reading this knows of one for sale, I would be interested!
Calbe offer some CD-standard developing agent as raw chemical, but not CD-1. That may mean, they don't use it in A49, don't make A49 any longer, or keep it for themselves.
Make your decision.
I don't have (CD1) but I do (CD2) and I added it instead of (CD1) Do you think it will work fine?
Or do you think we need (CD4)?
It is also available with me, would you recommend using it?
I mixed the developer, and it was difficult to dissolve, and it took a little hydroxide ...
but I do not know ,,
With regard to temperature and time ,,
What is the starting point?
Current number is 8.4 - The package has been sold to a colleague as is, without trial or test. He also got a developer (FX10)
The price is a swap - he will pay the cost of repairing a Ricoh and other Nikon cameras.
- I think it is a very fair deal. Most likely it is a win-win situation.
- I don't know what the results will be - but I'm optimistic.
Thank you, my dear brother - may God bless you.