+1 and I'll add that I used to have a car that ran perfectly, but only when it was in the mechanic's shop with the hood up, sort of the opposite of your problem.I recommend that one take photographs with the camera backs closed. YMMV
+1 and I'll add that I used to have a car that ran perfectly, but only when it was in the mechanic's shop with the hood up, sort of the opposite of your problem.
I find it hard to drive a car with the hood up.
I don't understand either, but if with the tab depressed the shutter functions, you have a place to start.Well, I have film in it now, so...
But I'm sure pressing the tab would fool it into thinking the back was closed and the shutter would be fine. Yet, my question is: why? I don't understand how the film counter engagement could have anything to do with shutter timing.
Except that in this case, absent further information, it seems that it may effect the shutter. Who knows what was done in this camera before the op came into posession?I have the feeling that the shutter works erratically when pointing the camera downwards. Try it with and without the back closed. It seems like a time for a good cla.
The frame counter does not affect the shutter.
Your camera is haunted. That’s a gremlin tricking you. That behavior is both unexplainable and unnatural.
It isn't gremlins, it's demonically posessed and needs excorcism. Just hope it's one of the minor demons.Everybody's thinking it...GREMLINS....I'm glad you were brave enough to say it.
When was that CLA done and why not return it for re-evaluation?
To me the symptoms (and some of the conjecture) makes no sense to me at all. I'd bet that "something" is wrong with the shutter and your only occasionally noticing it because it is either intermittent or your observations are fawlty.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?