PhotoManiac3000 said:Can someone explain to me how an artistic nude photo could be considered pornography?
mhv said:The other question we wish to consider is whether pornography can be antithetical to art. IF it is porno, then is it AUTOMATICALLY not art? For some people it's one or the other. I'd be more inclined to believe that there are things such as porno and not-porno, the same way there are things such as art and not-art.
Art is more in the making of things, not in its subject matter. If everything that wasn't art was porno, then a highway would be pornographic!
blansky said:How about "if you wait long enough everything is art."
Michael
Peter De Smidt said:There is no perfectly acceptable definition of pornography that I know of. Still, here's a try: a photograph is pornographic when the main intent behind it is to create sexual excitement.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?