NPR story on Kodak Shirley Negatives

Watering time

A
Watering time

  • 0
  • 0
  • 12
Cyan

D
Cyan

  • 1
  • 0
  • 12
Sunset & Wine

D
Sunset & Wine

  • 3
  • 0
  • 18
Adam Smith

A
Adam Smith

  • 1
  • 0
  • 69
Adam Smith

A
Adam Smith

  • 4
  • 0
  • 89

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,098
Messages
2,786,127
Members
99,809
Latest member
OttoMaass
Recent bookmarks
0

laser

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Jun 16, 2005
Messages
1,056
Format
4x5 Format
http://www.npr.org/series/358046323/colors

National Public Radio ran a story today about Kodak Printer Control Tool a.k.a. Shirleys. The purpose of Shirleys were to provide a visual standard so that photo finishers could easily establish and maintain their color negative film/print workflows. To support this Kodak provided a negative series made at normal, over, and under exposures. Also, accompanying the set there was a color print of each of the negatives.

Until about 1990 this was done with actual camera originated film negatives. A great deal of care was taken in making sure that the film was typical of film in the marketplace and the film process was representative of a well-maintained yet typical film process.


I thought APUG readers would be interested in how this need progressed from photographing the original seen thousands of times to creating negatives using digital imaging in also how it was used to design modern films

By the 1990s image simulation and film writers had progressed to the point that it was possible to provide standard negative sets that would be representative of trade quality but with far less variability in the population of the control tool sets.



These digital standard negatives were made by photographing the original scene, similar to the one shown in the article. This was done on 8 x 10 Ektachrome 64 Film. The transparency was then scanned and "unbuilt" to create a master file. The image was then rebuilt to reflect the characteristics of the particular color negative film and a typical color negative film process and written on to 35mm and 120-size film using a production film writer. The films from the film writer and a standard print were provided to consumer photo finishers and professional processing laboratories.

The same in building and rebuilding techniques were used to design PORTRA Films as well as other Kodak films that were introduced after 2000. These techniques allowed film designers to modify the various characteristics of the film and paper to produce the desired final results. Before the use of such simulation techniques it was necessary to actually make and coat emulsions in order to demonstrate different image characteristics. It required a great deal of effort to create the system but once this was done the input parameters could be incrementally modified to demonstrate the influence on the final result. Once the aim was established calculations were made to determine the required characteristics of the film. These characteristics would include curve shape, spectral sensitivity, color masking, printing density etc. Then the film builder was given the task of creating a film that satisfies these requirements.

The acceptance of PORTRA Films demonstrates the success of the technique.





Bob Shanebrook
author of "Making KODAK Film"
 
OP
OP
laser

laser

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Jun 16, 2005
Messages
1,056
Format
4x5 Format
I used Dragon NaturallySpeaking to create this. I see a typo that may cause some confusion:


Next-to-last paragraph "the same unbuilding and rebuilding..."
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Thank you for hinting at that report and your respective comment!
 

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,504
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
Thank you for mentioning the speech recognition program. A little off track, but since you mentioned it, a few years ago I decided to go that route (typing on a keyboard seems so hopelessly primitive in this present time period, and I want to free myself from sitting in front of a monitor)) so I downloaded a freeware program and bought a good mike. Time to get it going and train the thing.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
I recently posted a photo of 3 "unknown" Shirleys. They represent 3 flesh tones and hair colors along with grades of fabric. We used them internally to get good reproduction of a variety of flesh tones.

PE
 

andrew.roos

Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
572
Location
Durban, Sout
Format
35mm
Thanks - fascinating historical insight.

It occurs to me that very few modern photo finishers go to a similar effort to calibrate their processes.
 

Andrew K

Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
624
Location
Melbourne, A
Format
Multi Format
Actually no. Whether printing film or digital wet labs still need to be calibrated daily. All labs I know do so. It's just a natural part of the daily set up for the lab, much like running C41 and RA control strips....

Yes - I've spent too long working in labs...
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom