Normal vignetting?

It's also a verb.

D
It's also a verb.

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
The Kildare Track

A
The Kildare Track

  • 9
  • 3
  • 90
Stranger Things.

A
Stranger Things.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 58

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,912
Messages
2,782,987
Members
99,744
Latest member
Larryjohn
Recent bookmarks
0

flyingchange

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2023
Messages
5
Location
Montana
Format
Medium Format
Usually when people talk about vignetting I don't even see what they're talking about. This seems kind of dramatic though. Is this a normal/expected/acceptable level of vignetting? This is a Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm F/1.8G that I bought new in January. These shots are from an F80 but this has also happened with my F100. It's all on shots where the camera is focused on something in the distance - shots in low light are fine, and shots in bright light focused on something close are fine. Anyone know what is going on here? Appreciate any advice.
 

Attachments

  • 000553170024.jpg
    000553170024.jpg
    1.7 MB · Views: 111

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,011
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Welcome to Photrio.
Usually I leave Nikon questions to the Nikon knowledgeable.
But isn't a DX Nikkor designed for a cropped sensor (or APS film) sensor?
Don't you need a FX Nikkor for a 135 film body?
 

AnselMortensen

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2020
Messages
2,479
Location
SFBayArea
Format
Traditional
^^^^This.^^^^^
What's happening here is that by using a DX lens on an FX-size sensor or 35mm film camera, you are effectively reducing the focal length by a factor of 1.4
In this case, it is converting your lens to a 25mm lens that doesn't cover the larger format.
Conversely, using an FX or "35mm camera" lens on a DX camera, the effective focal length is increased by a factor of 1.4
Hope this helps!
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
flyingchange

flyingchange

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2023
Messages
5
Location
Montana
Format
Medium Format
Oh my gosh, thank you!! I was going by the lens compatibility chart on Ken Rockwell's site which says that AF-S and G lenses work on these cameras. Didn't think about the FX/DX thing at all. So the Nikon 35mm f/1.8 FX is the one I want? Gosh I feel like a dope, thank you again.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,011
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
^^^^This.^^^^^
What's happening here is that by using a DX lens on an FX-size sensor or 35mm film camera, you are effectively reducing the focal length by a factor of 1.4
In this case, it is converting your lens to a 25mm lens that doesn't cover the larger format.
Conversely, using an FX or "35mm camera" lens on a DX camera, the effective focal length is increased by a factor of 1.4
Hope this helps!

Not quite.
A 35mm lens is a 35mm lens, whether it covers the frame or not.
If you happen to use a film frame or sensor that is smaller than the format that the lens is designed for, then yes, you end up with a field of view that is smaller than what is available from the lens, so the effect is similar to using a longer lens.
But it doesn't really work the other way - at least not in a practical way - because of the vignetting.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,011
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
And don't feel bad - the FX/DX dichotomy is a bit hard to track - particularly if you aren't a Nikon film and digital user.
 
OP
OP
flyingchange

flyingchange

Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2023
Messages
5
Location
Montana
Format
Medium Format
And don't feel bad - the FX/DX dichotomy is a bit hard to track - particularly if you aren't a Nikon film and digital user.

Yeah I don't even own a Nikon digital camera.... maybe this will be my excuse to get one now. :wink:
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,011
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
The Canon approach is simpler - they won't even let you attach an EF-S lens on to a full frame EF or film body.
Although I do have a fun little 22-55mm zoom in EF mount that was designed for the APS film bodies, but covers full frame and film quite nicely.
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,784
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
You should use it. Then you can cut the corners off the prints like they did on Battlestar Galactica
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,372
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Usually when people talk about vignetting I don't even see what they're talking about. This seems kind of dramatic though. Is this a normal/expected/acceptable level of vignetting? This is a Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm F/1.8G that I bought new in January. These shots are from an F80 but this has also happened with my F100. It's all on shots where the camera is focused on something in the distance - shots in low light are fine, and shots in bright light focused on something close are fine. Anyone know what is going on here? Appreciate any advice.

Welcome to APUG Photrio!!
 

rcphoto

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 20, 2022
Messages
321
Location
Kentucky
Format
Medium Format
I used the 35 1.8 dx on my F5 quite a bit. Really only noticed the vignette stopped down below f8. Wide open never had much issue.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom