No old cameras allowed I guess...

mgb74

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 24, 2005
Messages
4,777
Location
MN and MA US
Format
Multi Format
Wow. Scanning the posts, you'd think the meet was held in North Korea.

Step back, take a deep breath, and recognize that whatever rule is in place was put there with good intentions - no matter how poorly framed or poorly enforced.

That doesn't mean accept it, but it doesn't mean being a jerk about it either. +1 to Matt and Winger's suggestions.
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
Step back, take a deep breath, and recognize that whatever rule is in place was put there with good intentions - no matter how poorly framed or poorly enforced.

What might those "good intentions" be?

I wonder if a young woman would be asked to put her camera away.
 

mgb74

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 24, 2005
Messages
4,777
Location
MN and MA US
Format
Multi Format
What might those "good intentions" be?

I wonder if a young woman would be asked to put her camera away.

People don't want strangers taking pictures of young children at a swim meet. There are some strange people out there; not many, but some. May sound silly to restrict photos (and probably is), but that doesn't mean there is a malicious intent behind the rule (keep in mind I said malicious, not foolish). As to whether a young woman would be asked to put her camera away, that points to the silliness of the rule rather than it's intent.

I believe the best way to address ignorance is with education; whereas malice generally requires confrontation.

And keep in mind what Abraham Lincoln said: "The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly."
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…