NO, NO, NO, NO NO NO NO!!! WRONG!

EASmithV · Jan 10, 2010

Dead Link Removed

johnnywalker · Jan 10, 2010

Good Grief, even a non-photographer would recognize the error here (providing they're over the age of 14).

hoffy · Jan 10, 2010

That's actually quite funny. Was that written by Eastmans Great Grandchildren or something?

Ian Grant · Jan 10, 2010

Perhaps the writer should learn to read before writing

Then look up the word "antique" Followed by a visit to "The Impossible Project" website.

Ian

Jesper · Jan 10, 2010

If you already know the truth, why bother with checking the facts?

Michael W · Jan 10, 2010

Looks like some kind of auto written site, with lots of commercial links. Probably just set up to earn affiliate fees.

Rick A · Jan 10, 2010

The only thing I have to say is, now I know where not to look for info.

Rick

bdial · Jan 10, 2010

Yet another reason to stick with APUG for photographic info on the web.

winger · Jan 10, 2010

It also says at the bottom that it's filed under "digital cameras" and was posted in June 2007.

alexmacphee · Jan 10, 2010

Clearly someone at Kodak in 1970 had the brilliant idea that the market was ready for a new antique camera, and came up with the concept of the SX70 instant picture antique camera.

Alas, Kodak has lost its way since those heady days, and has forgotten how to make and market antique cameras.

I wish I could afford the Nikon D3X antique camera.

Andy K · Jan 10, 2010

I'm bookmarking that site, I'm looking forward to their review of the Nikon M6 TTL rangefinder...

Jeff Kubach · Jan 10, 2010

That was funny, can't believe that anyone can make such a mistake.

Jeff

Moopheus · Jan 10, 2010

What model Polaroid is actually shown in the photo? It's not an SX-70. I'm not expert on Polaroid models, but that's a later vintage camera, isn't it?

removed-user-1 · Jan 10, 2010

According to this image at Dead Link Removed, that's some variant of a Polaroid Sonar camera (which did take SX-70 film).

I actually own a REAL Kodak Instant Camera, one of the few (?) not sent back to Kodak after they lost the lawsuit Polaroid brought against them.

Ektagraphic · Jan 10, 2010

Wow that's news to me!

removed account4 · Jan 10, 2010

i have a kodak sx70 on my shelf and i have been shooting polaroid tri x and fuji plus x for years.
not really sure what the problem is ...

railwayman3 · Jan 10, 2010

I suppose that many people still equate "Kodak" with everything photographic!

But that's no excuse for getting facts so wrong in a written article. :rolleyes:

Q.G. · Jan 10, 2010

jnanian said:
i have a kodak sx70 on my shelf and i have been shooting polaroid tri x and fuji plus x for years.
not really sure what the problem is ...

The problem is that all too many people think that AGFA made Gevaert film, while all along it was Gevaert who made AGFA film.
A disgrace, it is...

Ricus.stormfire · Jan 11, 2010

Ok then...still looking for the Kodak badge on mine

lxdude · Jan 11, 2010

Andy K said:
I'm bookmarking that site, I'm looking forward to their review of the Nikon M6 TTL rangefinder...

Rangefinder?! You of course mean view camera!

lxdude · Jan 11, 2010

Q.G. said:
The problem is that all too many people think that AGFA made Gevaert film, while all along it was Gevaert who made AGFA film.
A disgrace, it is...

Oy Gevaert!

lxdude · Jan 11, 2010

"Addicted to Life"... Gee, so am I. Or more specifically, addicted to oxygen.

jd callow · Jan 11, 2010

alexmacphee said:
I wish I could afford the Nikon D3X antique camera.

I believe that Ilford makes the D3x antique camera.

amuderick · Jan 11, 2010

completely computer generated. you may have been the first human eyes to see it.

NO, NO, NO, NO NO NO NO!!! WRONG!

removed-user-1

Moderator

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency