Nikon zoom lens for thru-hiking the Appalachian Trail

GeorgeDexter

Member

Joined

Apr 20, 2008

Messages

112

Location

Dexter, MI

Format

35mm

• Feb 12, 2009

• #26

I don't recommend either of the 24-120mm lenses. I've read poor reviews of the D version and have experienced first-hand the poor sharpness of the VR version. My Nikkor 28-105mm f3.5-4.5 is MUCH sharper, and has a pretty good (1:3) macro setting, for a zoom lens. Love the F100. Metering was always spot-on for my Velvia 50 slides.

Are you going to shoot transparency or neg film?

 

Last edited by a moderator: Feb 12, 2009

Nicholas Lindan

Advertiser

Advertiser

Joined

Sep 2, 2006

Messages

4,248

Location

Cleveland, Ohio

Format

Multi Format

• Feb 12, 2009

• #27

My choice would be 24, 50 and 105mm lenses and a 1.4x telextender. And as suggested - the lightweight AF plastic versions of the lenses. I am just not a fan of zooms: more of a 'fast glass/slow film' shooter.

Weight is a most important factor for hiking, and I don't know that Nikon makes especially light cameras, certainly mine aren't. The old Canon Rebel was a light weight wonder - though one body may not make it through the entire hike.

 

AutumnJazz

Member

Joined

Apr 2, 2008

Messages

742

Location

Fairfield, C

Format

35mm

• Feb 12, 2009

• #28

I had the 24-120 VR and it was not a good lens. Soft, focus problems,heavy etc. I didn't like it.

If I was going for a hike like that, I'd just get a 35/2, 85/1.8, and some tele lens.

 

Christopher Walrath

Member

Joined

Dec 30, 2005

Messages

7,175

Location

Milton, DE USA

Format

Analog

• Feb 12, 2009

• #29

Don't worry, B. We're just living vicariously through you.

 

waynecrider

Subscriber

Joined

Feb 8, 2003

Messages

2,576

Location

Georgia

Format

35mm

• Feb 12, 2009

• #30

Definitely read A Walk in The Woods. Lens wise if you were thinking to carry a converter and change it all the time when you need it you may as well carry two light primes. Zoom with your feet.

 

GeorgeDexter

Member

Joined

Apr 20, 2008

Messages

112

Location

Dexter, MI

Format

35mm

• Feb 12, 2009

• #31

For a fast tele prime, the Nikkor AIS 200mm f4 is small, light and sharp!

 

Rol_Lei Nut

Member

Joined

Jul 2, 2006

Messages

1,108

Location

Hamburg

Format

Multi Format

• Feb 13, 2009

• #32

While for most long-distance walks I've gone over to the dark side for weight reasons (a D*** P&S), my lightest-weight & most compact walking film kit is a rangefinder.

Lenses are tiny (I carry 21 + 35 + 90 & sometimes a 15mm), also lighter (though the Leica M6 itself isn't as light as its size would indicate). The cheaper & lighter CV bodies could be a way to go.
AF, motorized advancement, long lenses & batteries are no-nos on long walks.
For landscapes & photographing the people you meet you won't need lots of automation & fast frame rates.
But you *will* feel every gramme you're carrying!