BradS
Member
Ain't it great! I'm thinking you need a few more. F through F5 bodies with every possible finder.
all still working 35mm-cameras are good these days but, to make it easier for buyers, there is an ISO standard to print the word 'Nikon' on the best of them.
I would dispute that Ralph, Nikon never made a professional manual focus film S.L.R as technically advanced as the Canon New F1, the Nikon F3 isn't in the same league.all still working 35mm-cameras are good these days but, to make it easier for buyers, there is an ISO standard to print the word 'Nikon'
on the best of them.
I would dispute that Ralph, Nikon never made a professional manual focus film S.L.R as technically advanced as the Canon New F1, the Nikon F3 isn't in the same league.
That's true, they also made them for more than twice as long, but you can't base the comparative quality on sales figures..Nikon sure made a heck of a lot more F3's than Canon did the New F1![]()
Brad, you are worse than Sirius. He doesn't own that many Hasselblads!![]()
I would dispute that Ralph, Nikon never made a professional manual focus film S.L.R as technically advanced as the Canon New F1, the Nikon F3 isn't in the same league.
Yes, totally different league- the Dead-Mount League. Canon dumped the FD mount shortly after the New Canon F1. Nikon still makes manual focus lenses. 35 years later, my F3AF still works- and I can use new Nikkor lenses on it.
Yes, totally different league- the Dead-Mount League. Canon dumped the FD mount shortly after the New Canon F1. Nikon still makes manual focus lenses. 35 years later, my F3AF still works- and I can use new Nikkor lenses on it.
I'm not sure Nikon made F3 cameras for the last ten years they sold them. Bad inventory management, the F and the F2 were Nikon's big days of leadership, after that Nikon played catch-up technologically speaking. I do love my F5. I have a D3 and a D5 because of the muscle memory I have from the F2 and F5. (Everything but my first F2 I bought used)That's true, they also made them for more than twice as long, but you can't base the comparative quality on sales figures..
Thanks Mick, I have owned the F2 , F3, F1n and New F1, and the F2 and F1n are more alike and the F3 and New F1 were contemporary with each other. The New F1 if it was used with the Power winder FN or the Motor Drive FN it gave the option of aperture or shutter priority AE and came out in time for the LA Olympic Games.I am in complete agreement with Benjiboy, this is from a person who bought his first F3 HP brand new in 1984/5 summer and used it alongside some people with the Canon New F1 at press events. The New F1 is capable of doing some things the F3 can only dream about; don't ask me what though. I distinctly remember standing alongside a women with the New F1 at the South Korean Olympic weight lifting entry competition for Australia in Melbourne. She was able to do things I was unable to do, I know this as she got the picture I wanted to get, but wasn't able.
Accidentally posted; continued as well as edited as I inserted the wrong Olympic games.
The biggest difference is the ability to do either aperture or shutter priority, this really is a nice difference and one many people of today don't know about.
With various add-ons the New F1 was certainly a superior camera.
That said, I've never regretted my decision to go with Nikon rather than Canon. I was deciding which way to go and took about 6 months to decide. The availability of second hand lenses was really the deciding point for me. Shed loads of Nikkor lenses compared to Canon lenses with a lower price for Nikkor lenses.
To reiterate; Benjiboy is on the money.
Mick.
Was Canon New F1 the only flagship camera of the time not offering TTL flash exposure control?
The children, please think of the children!
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |