• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Nikon Lenses

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
202,944
Messages
2,847,905
Members
101,549
Latest member
mennojim
Recent bookmarks
0

Frank Teodosio

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 16, 2006
Messages
26
Format
Medium Format
I previously asked this Forum about the difference between the 80-200mm F2.8 and F.28D. In talking with others they suggested checking out the 70-210 F4-5.6 AF lens. Any info would be appreciated, so as I can make a dicisson on what to buy.

Thanks a lot...

F
 
Keep your first idea, the 80-200 f2.8 is just the best buy. It's been replaced now by the 70-200 AFS. Some of them have a problem with the silent internal motor unable to reach infinity, or doing so painfully making ugly noises. Aaaargh! I gave up mine and finally kept my 5-year old 80-200.
:smile:
 
I owned all three models of the Nikkor 80-200 mm zoom. Other than the first model with the plastic mount for the front element which would easily break, always loved the lens.

Now I have the 70-200 mm zoom. It always reaches infinity, and has never made an ugly noise. Great lens. The more millimeters the better I say. HA!

I'm sorry our friend from Buxelles has had such a problem with the 70-200. Nikon should have fixed your lens under warrantee.
 
Thanks

Thanks to all for your input, It has been greatly appreciated.

Thanks again

Frank T (photo144)
 
I own the 70-210/4-5.6 AF and the 80-200/2.8 AF (both non-D). The 2.8 blows away the 4-5.6.

So why do I own both? The 70-210 is about a third of the weight of the 80-200. There are times when I would carry it and not the 2.8. The 70-210 is also dirt cheap. (I paid $55 for mine.)
 
I has to be an exceptional non-ED lens to keep up with an ED lens. I've seen it happen, but most of the old lenses just are not as good. But, old zooms like Vivitar's Series 1 are a dime a dozen so experimenting is cheap.
 
In term of zooms; the 800-200 f/2.8 is great. I prefer primes. In that area I doubt that an ED would be better than an old one. I have both, but I prefer an old prime any time.
 
Nothing beats personal experience
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom