This looks like a problem where the lens is not perpendicular to the film plane judging by how the focal plane tilts backwards (see bottom left corner). It seems the lens is tilted forward (edit: it may be swung to the right as well). In addition to this, there may also be a mirror/ground glass alignment problem at play.
Yeah, that's not good. This shot is clearer; it looks like the lens is angled to the right, and contrary to what I said before, it may be looking very slightly upward, not pointing down.
I'd start by inspecting the lens mount to see if it has sustained any damage, and whether it's installed properly.
It's conceivable this camera suffered a major accident that bent the frame out of alignment.
The camera is nearly pristine.
If it somehow sustained a blow to the lens that was mounted, it's conceivable that the damage was only visible on the lens.
In any case, I'd poke around the lens mount a bit to see what you can find there. That, and maybe have a look at the pressure plate to see if it functions properly.
My vote is mirror alignment.
How does that explain the Scheimpflug movement to the focal plane?
<Picture of poodle>
That's the picture where I don't see any.
Not sure if you regularly work with a view camera, but I think it's kind of obvious really.
Anyone know who could actually repair it?
And, I'd say an ad hominum post is worthy of the intervention of a moderator
Don't take it that way; it wasn't intended as such. I'm just puzzled you don't see it, that's all.
My vote is mirror alignment.
First check for any evidence of amateur repair with damage to any screw heads. Check for evidence in any screw heads visible through the lens opening with the mirror moved out of the way. If screw heads are damaged then send the camera back with a note pointing out the damage.
To check just what is going on:
The results of this test will give you ammunition for returning the camera for replacement / refund if something is screwy.
- Tape a page of the newspaper (if anyone remembers what one is...) to the wall and make a "+" in the middle to focus on;
- Put the camera on a tripod and set the height so the center of the lens is at the 'X';
- Move back a few feet to a comfortable shooting distance and at a horizontal 45 degree angle to the wall and focus on, and center, the "+";
- Take pictures with the lens wide open.
If the focus is consistent (it is equally out of focus in either direction) up and down and side to side the problem is not lens perpendicularity. In any case, if the lens was not perpendicular, the focused on spot would be in focus in the picture. A non-perpendicular lens is sort of the norm if shooting with a view camera and it effects the plane of sharpest focus but not the focus point.
If the sharp->fuzzy transition points are equally distant from the "+" then there isn't (or shouldn't be) a focusing issue. In this case draw a pentagram on the floor, light candles at its five points and dance around the pentagram while waving a rubber chicken overhead to resolve the issue.
If the focus is to one side or the other of the X then the lens->focus screen and lens->film distances are different. If the focus is different top to bottom then lens perpendicularity can be suspect.
As the FM has a fixed focus screen, the screen position isn't likely to be the problem. Though if someone has gone in and mucked with things then bets are off. Is the screen the original pattern for an FM?
That leaves the only other possible issue as the mirror position. Is there any gunk on the back of the mirror? Is there any evidence of work on the inside of the mirror box?
Mirror alignment can shift if something goes haywire and the mirror doesn't return all the way. With the mirror down, does the lip of the mirror move if you press down on it? If so, return the camera with a note.
Cameras are sold for a reason - and one reason is that the camera isn't working quite right. A glaring malfunction is an obvious sale killer but something non-obvious can be a reason for someone selling a camera and walking away from it.
So I got the go ahead to send it back again.
I know I know...Whaaaaat? After all this, you are going to leave the cause of the problem unresolved? All our good advice wasted, just wasted.
Probably the best thing to do, though.
But, is Blue Moon going to load the camera with film, take shots of a test target, develop the film and make an enlarged print (or, I suppose make a scan, sigh) to judge the issue?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?