Is the film on the "standard" acetate base or a PET base (which is more prone to light piping)?
Motion picture film on a tri-acetate base.
There is no particular reason that it should be more prone to light piping.
Is there any chance that the cassettes are non-standard (smaller) in size, thus allowing light in through the film window?
Looks like the shutter to me. Had something similar with my Leica M3 back in the 1970s.
What kind of cassette? Does it seal appropriately around the window in the back, because the negatives seem to indicate light coming from that area.
I don't think this is a shutter problem -- the dark line expands past the shots and into the sprockets, outside of what the shutter uncovers.
A light leak is possible (I have one camera that leaks a little if I don't move the film along) but I would also suspect both the film and the development process.
Has this happened on more than one roll?
If that's bulk-rolled film, I'd either process some unexposed, or run a completely different roll through the camera and see if the issue pops up again.
I have lots of 40 year old cameras with bad light seals, as mentioned one that leaks a little, and haven't seen anything quite like that.
Yes the canister light trap is protecting some of the film, see post #32. The light still has to come from somewhere. Likely the window in the back door which is in the direct vicinity.It's not the camera with the light going all the way across like that. I bet it is the film canister light trap.
It's not the camera with the light going all the way across like that. I bet it is the film canister light trap.
Motion picture film on a tri-acetate base.
There is no particular reason that it should be more prone to light piping.
Is there any chance that the cassettes are non-standard (smaller) in size, thus allowing light in through the film window?
Interesting: http://www.filmotec.de/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/V-I-TI-N74plus-e.pdfAll of our ORWO is polyester base.
Save your time and money, don't send it to Nikon. I had the same problem, diagnosed it and sent my camera to them; they said there was no problem with the camera. The light comes through the little window that allows you to see the film cannister. As a test I covered mine with black electrical tape and it prevented the problem. The tape blends well with the body so it really doesn't show.
I've always got a good supply of gaffer – would that be light tight enough if I went that route?
Yes, we don't use that stock. All the lab stock is by default polyester; acetate is special order.
I would think so. If in doubt use 2 layers.I've always got a good supply of gaffer – would that be light tight enough if I went that route?
This image doesn't mention what film was used, but looks like the same problem:
Perhaps you and Jay are victims of the same film.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?