hi folks,
I recently got a Nikon f5 - I'm going on a trip for 3 weeks and wanted to rent a lens. Obviously renting multiple lenses for weeks at a time can get a pricy so i was hoping for a recommendation . I shoot full length portraits , usually medium format so this is my first time putting this type of thought into 35mm options. Is there a lens that would allow me to take nice full length portraits aswell as closer up versions without distortion? another option could be a zoom lens , but are they good on this camera? I'm assuming so, but wanted to ask the forum their thoughts on a good singular option.
cheers
Nikon 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR would be what I would rent.
Nikon 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR would be what I would rent.
For full length porturites a 105, 50, and 85 will be just too tight in close quartets.
If you use a wide lens, especially in close quarters, you will have distortion up the YING-YANG -- something the OP is worried about:
"Is there a lens that would allow me to take nice full length portraits aswell as closer up versions without distortion?"
Full length at 105, need about 20 feet to get full length, 50 to 105 gives little room for shooting indoors, 35 will just work, 28 a bit more, 24 to 70 is best bet.
hi folks,
I recently got a Nikon f5 - I'm going on a trip for 3 weeks and wanted to rent a lens. Obviously renting multiple lenses for weeks at a time can get a pricy so i was hoping for a recommendation . I shoot full length portraits , usually medium format so this is my first time putting this type of thought into 35mm options. Is there a lens that would allow me to take nice full length portraits aswell as closer up versions without distortion? another option could be a zoom lens , but are they good on this camera? I'm assuming so, but wanted to ask the forum their thoughts on a good singular option.
cheers
This. The 20mm, 24mm, and 35mm all show considerable distortion close up ... which is one of their strengths as creative tools. Both the 85mm and 105mm will produce gorgeous portraits with wonderful bokeh wide open, although the 85mm has almost no depth of field wide open - an eye can be in focus, but not an ear or nose, so one has to take care when shooting it.
If I had to pick one and only one, it would be the 85mm f/1.4. I have it in its Ai-S incarnation and shoot it both on film and digibodies and it's a wondrous piece of glass. You do have to learn to use it and respect its DOF demands, but it's well worth it. If you step back, you can get full length portraits. But it will also let you get in much closer for waistlevel and head & shoulders shots. Here is something I shot with that lens from around 6 feet away, if memory serves.
Scan of sliver print:
The 85 1.4 is a fabulous lens, but pricey. The 1.8 is nice, but not as good as the 1.4.
Keep in mind, the OP intends to rent. If he later is willing to forego AF, Ai-S versions of the 85 f/1.4 can be had at reasonable prices ... for some definition of the word "reasonable".
Around here 3 weeks rental will run $75-135, depending on the lens. Not sure about any international contingencies. And rental vs new stock is usually different domains.Rental, that's a twist. I would think that these folks would have a 28 - 70 in stock
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?