Nikon F2 vs Nikon FM2

monkowa

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2015
Messages
51
Location
Missoula, Mo
Format
35mm
I'd pick the F2. Only reason being that the viewfinder is larger and it's easier on my eyes. I own both and they're both phenomenal cameras.
 

abruzzi

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2018
Messages
3,070
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
Large Format
I prefer the F2 because it works with pre-AI lenses, and most pre-AI lenses are much cheaper than AI or AIS lenses, and I'm cheap.
 

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,069
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format

Hi David,

The Nikkormat was an amateur camera while the F2 was the professional camera. The Nikkor lenses were intended for the Nikon F camera originally, a pro camera. The Nikkorex appeared soon and believe me, there's nothing 'smooth' about the Nikkorex, so, yes, the Japanese at Nippon Kogaku can 'gloss over' some refinements. The Nikkormat was to follow the Nikkorex.

Now, the build quality of the Nikkormat is excellent, of course, as is its precision. As I said, i'm not sure how real would be the impact of the vertical Nikkormat shutter on actual pictures. I got fine pictures with my Nikkormat, but a real test would have to be done with slow shutter speeds and a "control" camera for comparison.
 
Last edited:

DonW

Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2020
Messages
502
Location
God's Country
Format
Medium Format
This would be perfect as a signature text here at Photrio.



What's your impression of the Canon F-1, compared to the F2?
I preferred the Nikon F2. The Canon is a good camera though, nothing wrong with it. That's why they make chocolate and vanilla.
 

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,069
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format
I preferred the Nikon F2. The Canon is a good camera though, nothing wrong with it. That's why they make chocolate and vanilla.

Wow, this is a great reply.
 

John Koehrer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2004
Messages
8,277
Location
Aurora, Il
Format
Multi Format
The shock may be from the difference of travel time* between copal and horizontal travel.
Copal runs about 6.5ms and horizontal is about 12 ms

*travel time is the speed at which both blades of the shutter move across the film aperture.
 

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,069
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format
The shock may be from the difference of travel time* between copal and horizontal travel.
Copal runs about 6.5ms and horizontal is about 12 ms

*travel time is the speed at which both blades of the shutter move across the film aperture.

However the Canon New F-1 has 7.5±0.2ms of travel time (source: Service manual), and it's very smooth.

The Nikon F3, having similar flash sync speed, should have a very similar curtain travel time. And its shutter is extremely smooth and gentle.

I think it has something to do with the refinement of the shutter. Many vertical shutters are intended so for compactness above all, and the mechanism is very small compared to a horizontal shutter. Thus i'd bet the braking system, etc, is less sophisticated.
 

Huss

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
9,058
Location
Hermosa Beach, CA
Format
Multi Format
The shock may be from the difference of travel time* between copal and horizontal travel.
Copal runs about 6.5ms and horizontal is about 12 ms

*travel time is the speed at which both blades of the shutter move across the film aperture.

Not surprising. Traveling vertically the shutter blades need to only cover 24mm, while horizontally 36mm.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…