It's the new technology.What the hell is a mirrorless?
it's not very new[/QUOTE
It is when your newest camera is a Canon F1N- AE made in July 1981
it's not very new[/QUOTE
It is when your newest camera is a Canon F1N- AE made in July 1981
Why don't they call the original Leica mirrorless. It doesn't have a mirror (not even a rangefinder system which has mirrors).
To me who started my photography in 1953 with a Zeiss Contax 11made in 1936 my Dad brought back from Germany after WW11, my Canon F1-N' s are the the height of sophistication, and as high tech as I want or need.It's true Ben, all things are relative. And so that 1981 Canon is pretty new tech compared to a IIId or similar ....
"mirrorless" simply came into use in the digital world to distinguish the short register interchangeable lens cameras (mostly micro4/3) from dSLRs. No SLR mirror mechanism = mirrorless.
They are improving the resale price of some of the classic lenses, since there are adaptors that let you mount just about any film SLR or rangefinder lens on just about any "mirror-less" body.
A situation that has its plusses and minuses, I think.
True but only if one wants to indulge in digital photography, and plunder the technology that digital has all but destroyed, all it does for the rest of us who are film photographers is put the prices of analogue lenses up.
I believe that in modern day parlance that's what the general understanding of what a mirrorless camera is, one with an electronic viewfinder that obviates the need for a mirror.Oh now I got it! To be called a mirrorless it has to be digital?
One with the manufacturers name and model number taped over so as not to attract attention.What is a taped-over camera?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?